ATG FEATHERWEIGHT TOURNIE: SF 1 - HENRY ARMSTRONG UD15 WILLIE PEP

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, Jun 8, 2020.


Who will win?

Poll closed Jun 11, 2020.
  1. Pep

    38.1%
  2. Armstrong

    61.9%
  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,065
    Mar 21, 2007
    World collide. The legendary swarmer Henry Armstrong, fresh of his KO of Terry McGovern meets the greatest pure boxer in the division's history, Willie Pep, who cleanly out-boxed the great Pedroza.

    Here is a list of the made men that Willie Pep (seeded 1) defeated:

    Ray Famechon, Charley Riley, Eddie Compo, Sandy Saddler, Humberto Sierra, Jock Leslie, Jackie Graves, Sal Bartolo, Phil Terranova, Charles Lewis, Manuel Ortiz and Chalky Wright.

    It is a longer list of ranked contenders or significant scalps taken than any other featherweight in history by measure.

    But it was the manner in which he bested them that really sets him apart.

    Willie Pep was not a technician in the strictest of terms; his style is not one that should ever be taught to prospective pugilists. That would be like asking a nine year old with good spatial awareness to equal the Mona Lisa. Rather, Pep was fundamentally sound, in that he rarely if ever overstretched his physical abilities during technical execution, the definition of fistic legitimacy.

    The reality was perfection even if the technique was sometimes questionable. What I mean by this is that he did things that would be deemed imperfect in the strictest sense of technical excellence but those things yielded impossible results. It is not enough to say “he got away with it” – he re-defined “it” for his own ends, like all true mavericks.

    Based primarily upon this disturbing mixture of sound and unsound footwork, which both removed him from and introduced him to punching range depending upon his needs, Pep worked to the tiniest of margins, perfect for inducing foolish risks in otherwise sound opponents, but failing to translate somewhat to the bigger divisions against fighters with longer reaches – Pep’s best was, inarguably, at featherweight.

    He feinted with those feet, boxing high on his toes whether pivoting, coming in or coming out, coming down only when it was safe for him to do so. But Pep hacked boxing’s Matrix. It was safe for him to punch when mortal fighters had to cover up. Pep, more any other fighter, boxed in perfect harmony with his body, dancing to a tune nobody else could hear.

    All this birthed perhaps the greatest hot-streak in boxing: 135-1-1, with neither draw nor loss coming at featherweight.

    This content is protected


    The terror that was thirteenth seed Henry Armstrong.

    Unparalleled in his chosen style; as lethal, as terrifying, as devastating as any man who has ever set foot upon a taught and blood-sodden canvas – one of the few men who could legitimately claim to be as good as anyone who came before or after.

    At featherweight, Armstrong’s position is less assured. In fact, before he even made a mark at featherweight he had begun his exploration of lightweight, his assault in earnest at 126lbs not beginning until 1935, four years after he turned professional, with a defeat of the shadow of the once great flyweight Midget Wolgast. Wolgast was toying with obesity at featherweight but he had still done enough damage to earn himself a top five ranking and a reputation as a spoiler deluxe, a nightmare for a prospect, however talented. In the second, Armstrong dribbled the champion down the ropes and never really looked back, crashing his way to a ten round decision. More top five stalwarts followed, including Baby Arizmendi in their 1936 encounter, their only meeting at featherweight and a fight he won so clearly that some sources see him victorious in every round. Title claimant Mike Belloise was next, battered into a retreat and a ten round loss, Armstrong refused recognition by the alphabet organization in question due to their championship limit being fifteen rounds; Armstrong knocked him out in four in a rematch, perhaps to punish him for the inconvenience, before being recognized as lineal the following year after handing out similar treatment to Pete Sarron.

    Not an irrefutably great featherweight, but an irrefutably frightening one.

    This content is protected


    Who will win under the following rules?

    15 round fight.
    1950s referee.
    8oz boxing gloves.
    10 points must.

    Cast your vote and explain yourself in a post below! You have 3 days
     
    Clinton and roughdiamond like this.
  2. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,362
    21,807
    Sep 15, 2009
    Man this is tough.

    My default pick and the button I clicked straight away was Pep.

    But then I'm expecting him to do what no one else ever did and keep Armstrong from getting inside.

    I mean Lou Ambers was a great great fighter and as close as their fight was he didn't come close to stopping Armstrong getting inside.

    Ross was a great great fighter and he didn't come close to stopping Armstrong from getting inside.

    Is it reasonable to expect any FW from keeping Armstrong at distance? I don't know any more.

    But then again no one apart from Saddler (after pep had been in a plane crash and was told he'd never walk again) ever got inside of Pep.

    I'm torn here. I came confidently picking Pep, but the more I think about it, the more I think it's ridiculous expecting Pep to keep the fight at range for a full 15 rounds.

    That is a ludicrous notion isn't it, at some point Armstrong will get him against the roped and slow him down and probably knock him out.

    What a shock to me this is.

    Changing my pick to Armstrong by ko. Happy to be on the wrong side of this debate though.

    Wait a minute.

    It's kind of like a higher skill version of Whitaker vs Chavez.

    Pep is a bit better than Whitaker, Armstrong is a bit better than Chavez. Whitaker manage to keep that up all night, and actually if he can against an offensive machine like Chavez, then Pep can against an offensive machine like Armstrong.

    I think.

    I change my mind again, Pep UD
     
  3. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,978
    19,019
    Oct 4, 2016
    Pep,, Willie at his best was magnificent and I think he'd have Armstrong resetting constantly with his footwork and movement. He'd never come close to hurting Hank but he'd take a clear UD.
     
    greynotsoold likes this.
  4. Drew101

    Drew101 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,769
    8,298
    Feb 11, 2005
    The problem with the Whitaker-Chavez analogy is that Chavez was past his peak and likely past his prime by the time they met in the ring, and fighting above his best weight. This assumes the best version of featherweight Arrmstrong vs the best version of featherweight Pep, so you don't have those mitigating circumstances attached to that match.

    Now, the best version of featherweight Pep was obviously an other-worldy boxer, which obviously will help his cause against Armstrong. More importantly, a close examination of his record indicates that he was a harder puncher than his record suggests. He waxed Bartolo with one punch, dropped McAllister for the count with a single left to the body, turned out Charley Riley's lights with an uppercut, left Jock Leslie on the mat for the proverbial count of "100" according to reports, and scored a whole bunch of KDs in fights that went the distance. He managed to score 61 KO's in his career, the vast majority occurring before he lost the title. So, in spite of his reputation as a feather-fist, he could hit when he wanted/needed to.

    And he'd definitely need to set down and punch against Armstrong. Armstrong was capable of closing distance on just about anyone that he faced, no matter how well they moved. So, Pep is getting tracked down at some point, and he's gonna have to hit hard enough to do some damage and give him the chance to find an exit route, slide out of range and re-set.

    But, can he do it consistently once the absolute best version of featherweight Armstrong gets into his groove (which is bound to happen)?

    I don't think he can.

    Armstrong may have looked unbalanced as he marauded, but he had a knack for weaving under the shot that his opponent was trying catch him with on the way in, allowing him to get into his desired range. As fast and accurate as Pep is, I think Armstrong manages to gunge his timing around round five or so, makes him miss more and more, and starts getting more and more business done on the inside. Not everything connects at first, but enough it does to cause Pep to become a little ragged, and a little more inclined to hold rather than fight. Armstrong, of course, will have none of that and even though I could see him getting cut up a little, eventually he busts Pep in return and belabors him down the stretch to earn a close but clear decision on the cards.

    Armstrong UD.
     
  5. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,799
    11,420
    Aug 22, 2004
    I voted Armstrong, just because I can't imagine anyone, Pep or anybody, holding THAT guy off for that long.
     
  6. greynotsoold

    greynotsoold Boxing Addict

    5,506
    7,041
    Aug 17, 2011
    I really don't know.
    The roads to victory for each guy are pretty clear. Armstrong needs to get close and work while Pep need to keep control of the distance and turn Armstrong so he can land his shots with no payback. They are both very busy, each in his own way, so it will be a fast paced fight.
    The variables, by my thinking:
    - both guys are accustomed to fighting their fight and making the opponent fight it too. So I expect each guy will have periods that favor his style. Who can get the most out of his opportunity?
    -the opposite of that, basically. Pep knows how to fight inside; he won't want to but he can and he will have to. Can he be effective enough? When Pep is at his range and moving, can Armstrong make him miss, keep from getting hit with combinations?
    -can Armstrong hurt Pep? Specifically, can he hurt Pep to the body? That will be key to slowing him down and I think it will be necessary if Armstrong is to hurt him to the head.
    -can Pep hurt Armstrong? I really don't think he can, not if by hurt you are thinking getting Armstrong wobbly or groggy. What I mean is, enough to make Armstrong think about it in close.
    -who defines the movement? My first thought was this; Pep's chance of winning ties directly to how often he moves how he wants to as opposed to how often he moves how Armstrong makes him. That will be the difference as to whether Armstrong is chasing or pressuring Pep. And they are not the same thing.

    I can see this fight getting rough with a lot of wrestling in close, low punches. It is going to be a close fight and go to the wire, unless Armstrong can hurt him to the body. Then he will pull away. I don't think it with any certainty at all, and I wouldn't bet on it, but I'm voting Armstrong.
    This fight really intrigues me and I would love to watch it.
     
  7. greynotsoold

    greynotsoold Boxing Addict

    5,506
    7,041
    Aug 17, 2011
    Really good post. Well said.
     
    Drew101 likes this.
  8. Drew101

    Drew101 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,769
    8,298
    Feb 11, 2005
    This is a lovely breakdown. I really like that question about who defines the movement and I think the outcome of the fight would probably hinge on that. My inclination is that Pep defines it early, and Armstrong does so late...It's just a matter of how long it takes for Hank to get started. Then again, Pep;s IQ might well allow him to adjust, and try a few raids of his own to keep Armstrong guessing.

    I'm still picking Armstrong, but this is a tough, tough fight to call.
     
    greynotsoold likes this.
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,065
    Mar 21, 2007
    Some very good posts. I'm going to break with a rule and make what i'd call an adversarial post in one of these threads, which i've been trying to avoid. But is everyone cognitive of who featherweight Armstrong is?

    Armstrong is 1-0 in featherweight title fights. His best scalp from this timeframe is Baby Arizmendi. Arizmendi also beat him in that period (At 130lbs). Armstrong's best performance at the weight, probably, is against Petty Sarron who he knocked out in six. Within a year of the Sarron fight, Armstrong lost to Richie Fontaine (29-9-6) and was dropped, roughed up, beaten by Joe Conde (51-19-4).

    My guess is Armstrong got better after Sarron, probably quite a little bit better. Pep, on the other hand, is probably the greatest pure boxer in history and is absolutely primed for this fight.

    I'm picking Pep to win by a comfortable margin.
     
    Reinhardt likes this.
  10. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,822
    44,485
    Apr 27, 2005
    Fantastic guys, just fantastic. I like Armstrong for everything you two have stated. Incredible matchup.
     
    young griffo and greynotsoold like this.
  11. CharlesBurley

    CharlesBurley Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,065
    1,879
    Feb 23, 2020
    I really don't know, I'll go with a draw. Or Pep wins 2 and loses 3 after getting broken down in a series. I mean if Saddler can catch up to Pep, I'd expect a more relentless faster Armstrong probably could. But maybe Pep could outbox him

    It's a draw

    It's not like he became prime several years later. He won the FW title and then went onto face the WW champion. Not because he was drained at FW but because he could as a natural 133lb guy. And 133lb guy isn't draining to make FW.
     
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,065
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yeah, I don’t think he struggled to make weight.

    I just think when I watch him batter ATG Barney Ross he doesn’t look like a fighter who got thrashed by a journeyman the year before.

    Armstrong has deeply troubling results at featherweight, and not in the distant past.
     
  13. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,131
    44,901
    Mar 3, 2019
    I like Armstrong big here. Pep's bag of tricks was seemingly endless, his rhythm breaking and universal head-movement combined with his walking foot-work means he should be able to dance circles round Armstrong. In practice, I don't think the fight would play out like that at all.

    No, I reckon Armstrong crowds, pressures and breaks down Pep, who doesn't have the workrate to keep up with Armstrong IMO. Hank can certainly replicate the 'dirtiness' which Saddler used to get under Pep's skin, and Armstrong has all the bullishness to execute a similar plan.

    But the biggest thing is that there's only so much room where Pep can stay in the centre of the ring, and he wasn't impossible to get on the ropes. Armstrong's strength and workrate are gonna pile up points whilst Pep has his back to the ropes.

    Armstrong UD15
     
    young griffo and Mike Cannon like this.
  14. CharlesBurley

    CharlesBurley Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,065
    1,879
    Feb 23, 2020
    Was he thrashed or beat though? I haven't read the fight report, is there one? I'm pretty sure there's no footage of these losses. It does look like he was gradually improving at featherweight looking at the change of results. Especially Arizmendi results where he went

    All the same I'd pick his peak performance, ie Sarron. Not that that Armstrong necessitates he beats Pep who was generally more dominant in a single weight class.
     
  15. CharlesBurley

    CharlesBurley Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,065
    1,879
    Feb 23, 2020
    Pep would look to circle, clinch inside and turn Armstrong to avoid this. While beating Hank to the punch on the outside. He'd also feint and counter Armstrong a fair bit.
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.