ATG: Who Ranks Higher? Duran or Hagler?

I think that Duran was better at lightweight than Hagler was at middleweight. Throw in the fact that Duran won titles in 4 weight classes, compared to one for Hagler, and Duran is an easy choice for me.

 

Duran, easily.

 

Not sure about that 1, but a case can be made

 

Go in-depth a bit more and tell us why.

 

Im not sure I understand your reasoning...Are you saying because he knocked out guys quicker he is greater than Roberto?

With that logic Tyrone Brunson all time p4p top 10 here we come.

 

Thats debatable...certainly not "much" better in any sense of the word.

I dont think Roberto would lose to guys like Monroe and Watts, though they were capable fighters who caught Marvin well before he hit his prime. Nor would he allow someone like Antuofermo to get that close to beating him.

Though I think Roberto quite clearly appeared to be the better fighter in his prime...Hagler probably does have the more solid resume at his best weight, I dont have a problem at all with someone saying that.

But Roberto shits over Marvin for p4p achievments, he won titles all the way up to 25 pounds over his prime weight. Which is equivalent to Marvin doing the same all the way to cruiser, which he certainly did not.

Leonard fought Hagler my friend...Marvin was leaving his peak but SRL was coming back from a long layoff.

 

:blood

 

You having a laugh?:scaredas:

 

Is he having a laugh?

 

You are talking poop asero.

 

No contest - Duran.