ATG: Who Ranks Higher, Floyd Mayweather Jr or Erik Morales?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by asero, Sep 17, 2011.


  1. Thaiad24

    Thaiad24 Active Member Full Member

    1,143
    3
    Jul 18, 2011
    2001 he was at super featherweight and barrera,nas and morales were at featherweight

    he has had plenty of chances

    also mosley years ago, cotto marg the same
     
  2. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,373
    309
    Jan 8, 2009
    10 years from now, 80% will say it's morales.

    Morales' legacy grows, Mayweather shrinks
     
  3. Rexrapper 1

    Rexrapper 1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,594
    722
    Aug 23, 2010
    No they won't. Why was Floyd second in the FOTD rankings? Why did Hopkins say Floyd is the best of his era P4P? How many times was Morales number 1 P4P? Everyone will remember Floyd as the greater fighter.
     
  4. Thaiad24

    Thaiad24 Active Member Full Member

    1,143
    3
    Jul 18, 2011
    erm.... cos he is a racist *****?
     
  5. spud1

    spud1 HAWK TIME!!!! Full Member

    10,667
    3
    May 8, 2010
    It's mayweather easily.

    Oscar de la Hoya is also greater than morales and mab.

    Better skill levels and resume.
     
  6. Rexrapper 1

    Rexrapper 1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,594
    722
    Aug 23, 2010
    They weren't in his weight class. Floyd was a big super featherweight. If Floyd beat them, people would say the same thing they say about his Hatton win. Also Nas, Mosley, Cotto, and Marg are not atg. I don't know what your talking about.
     
  7. Rexrapper 1

    Rexrapper 1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,594
    722
    Aug 23, 2010
    :lol: You got me there. I don't think he is racist though.
     
  8. spud1

    spud1 HAWK TIME!!!! Full Member

    10,667
    3
    May 8, 2010
    You ****ing muppet, you also claim PAC as the greatest ever.

    Your legacy cant shrink once it is established.

    These accusations are criminal. Just log off already.
     
  9. Thaiad24

    Thaiad24 Active Member Full Member

    1,143
    3
    Jul 18, 2011
    i suppose floyd never fights lighter opposition? and featherweight to super featherweight is 4lbs difference

    and what has 'he was a big super featherweight' got to do with anything? he was fighting at SFW , being a big one doesnt matter
     
  10. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,373
    309
    Jan 8, 2009
    How about Tyson's legacy? We all now that no one ranks him inside top 80
     
  11. spud1

    spud1 HAWK TIME!!!! Full Member

    10,667
    3
    May 8, 2010
    Thiad you pork eating son of a *****.

    CSamyor hamed, freitas and the three amigos were all to small for floyd and would not fight him. Actually one of the amigos did fight him after he had retired fir two years and got whooped every single round now that mofo is in a superfight with PAC two years later

    Gotta love a home grown stan
     
  12. spud1

    spud1 HAWK TIME!!!! Full Member

    10,667
    3
    May 8, 2010
    What has Tyson got to do with it. Answer the questions I have made about your statements.

    Btw Tyson beat two atg, and some good title holders.
     
  13. Rexrapper 1

    Rexrapper 1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,594
    722
    Aug 23, 2010
    I just told you that people would compare those fights to Hatton. "Floyd didn't fight them in their natural weight class". I'm talking about Floyd not having the chance to fight an atg in HIS weight class and your saying he should have moved Morales and Barrera up. I said Floyd was a big superfeather because he was. That is why he moved up in weight.
     
  14. Thaiad24

    Thaiad24 Active Member Full Member

    1,143
    3
    Jul 18, 2011
    nice
     
  15. Thaiad24

    Thaiad24 Active Member Full Member

    1,143
    3
    Jul 18, 2011
    fair enough! i was merely stating the fact that floyd has had chance to fight ATG's in their prime