ATG: Who Ranks Higher? Floyd Mayweather Jr. or Oscar De la Hoya!!!

Either way... Winky Wright would have dominated both of them.

 

oscar has lost every single one of his major fights

 

to TBomb, he lost the first fight and won the second fight very slightly ur drunk...But to my point you all say floyd ducked this fighter and that fighter but wen floyd was calling on these people to fight him they either ducked or was a arum fighter so plz kill dat ****

 

when you take atg in to account, first it is accomplishemnts that are taken into account and then skill level and adaptability etc.

 

STFU i picked yo boy but thats the way i see it,and the 2nd fight was close to, which Floyd won ,Mayweather is just not as impressive as some of you fanboys think,if he was he would'nt be compared with a guy that lost all of his big fights such as ODH if that was the case,now would it?:deal

 

if you put it that way then floyd clearly

 

Oscar lost to legends Mayweather padded his record against faded legends ! Imagine how many losses Floyd would have had if he took the route Oscar took !! If its just wins than Floyd but I beleive Oscar is as accomplished if not more ..

 

Your talking about an undefeated pound 4 pound fighter against a guy who never stepped up to the plate in the big fight.

 

Faded legends because in there prime who was willing to step up to the plate in fight floyd when he was calling everyone out????

 

Again if Floyd had taken the route Oscar took Floyd's fluffy undefeated record would have had some losses ..But if we are ranking wins hey Floyd gets the nod he is undefeated .And Winky Wright challenged Floyd on more than 1 occasion we he was cham at 154 in their primes ..Thats one person I could think of ..

 

Mayweather and its no contest. Lets say Oscar stepped up and fought better competition, fine. Problem is that he never beat the step up competition. And if someone wants to say "oh, he was robbed against Tito and Mosley" well he was given gift baskets against Sturm and Whittaker.

 

Oscar was gifted the fight against Sturm. I thought he won against Mosley the second fight, Quartey was a close win in my books with the twelth round deciding the fight. Tito should have been a win for Oscar. All of these fights were against the top of the division against fighters that were in their prime. Oscar challenged himself against the best. If Mayweather fought these guys in their prime he could of very well have been beat.

 

I can understand why someone would vote Floyd, I can understand why someone would vote Oscar.

This is a very close call, and either answer is perfectly valid. Oscar lost some, but Oscar fought a higher calibre of opposition throughout his career and frequently took on prime ATGs, something Floyd has consistently avoided doing.

But ultimately, I go with Floyd. Oscar has a better resume, but I give a very slight edge to PBF after considering all factors.

 

Exactly !

 

When it's all said and done we know how Oscar did against the top fighters of his time, With Mayweather it's mostly dream match-ups. I 'm not a hater, I can get past Floyds mouth because I do think its a show to get the PPV buys (which is working for him) I just feel he is so focused on the 0 he wont test himself.