ATG: Who Ranks Higher? Holyfield or Hopkins?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by asero, Jul 29, 2009.


  1. zarman

    zarman Guest

    i picked hopkins but have changed my mind!
     
  2. Blood Green

    Blood Green Guest

    Hopkins easily. He's mixed it up with way more pfp guys and done alright...far fewer spotty performances before being old as hell...really long title reign. Heavyweights don't get more credit just for being bigger.
     
  3. SAS2

    SAS2 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,173
    2
    Jun 24, 2006
    holyfield in a landslide
     
  4. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,537
    15,997
    Jul 19, 2004
    Hopkins, and for me, this isn't even close.
     
  5. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,537
    15,997
    Jul 19, 2004
    Actually, by and large, they do.

    :smoke
     
  6. Money7

    Money7 The Best Full Member

    1,440
    2
    Oct 6, 2004
    i went with holyfield based on resume and accomplishments... no knock on bhop though...he is almost just as high up there...
     
  7. Cruiser1

    Cruiser1 Champion Emeritus Full Member

    4,622
    2
    Feb 23, 2005
    Yeah cuz Howard Eastman, Morade Hakkar, Robert Allen, Syd Vanderpool, and Keith Holmes are just p4p badasses. Holyfield constantly faced the best and did so without facing mediocre fighters inbetween. Don't bother bringing up the Czyz fight cuz even the best fighters do that and the Bean fight was a mandatory and Holyfield's chance to fight in front of his home fans.
     
  8. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    Holyfield's opposition during his first reign as HW Champion [Bowe notwithstanding] was a joke...
     
  9. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Can I pick Hopkins and then not back it up?? I have an irrational conviction that he is the greater fighter, but I think the evidence sides with Holyfield a little. **** it, I'm changing my mind to Hopkins.
     
  10. jc

    jc Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,971
    14
    Sep 9, 2004
    Holyfield slightly.
     
  11. elTerrible

    elTerrible TeamElite General Manager Full Member

    11,392
    15
    May 24, 2006
    Hopkins.

    Hopkins has the longevity, he also is considered in the top 2 or 3 middleweights of all time. Holyfeld is conisdered the top cruiserweight ever but that division is a lot younger and hasnt had as many greats there. Holyfeld accomplished a lot at heavy but he is around 9-11 all time there.

    Holyfeld faced better opposition but he also lost to them too and Hopkins was more consistent.
     
  12. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    I think Evander might rank higher. Hard to say. I go back and forth. Hopkins had guys moving up to fight him at times, and Evander moved up and fought bigger guys.
     
  13. Stinky gloves

    Stinky gloves Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,255
    14
    May 31, 2007
    Holyfield had two separate careers as the best Cruiser in history and an
    exiting HW who fought the best competition available. What is in favor
    of Hopkins is his longevity when he actually stepped up in his later age
    and won some good fights ... but overall I'm more impressed with Holyfield
     
  14. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    This post puts forward a very good case for B-Hop.
     
  15. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,210
    6,765
    Jul 21, 2009
    Hopkins by a big margin.

    Holyfield at HW was largely one giant US hypejob that looked good against shorter fighters. Holyfield was finally exposed as guy relying on headbutts and clinching by Lewis. The Lewis fight marked the end of Holyfield.