ATG: Who ranks higher, Manny Pacquiao or Erik Morales?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by tinorknitz, Oct 3, 2011.


  1. EJDiaZ

    EJDiaZ Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,213
    422
    Aug 21, 2010
    Pac and Buboy
     
  2. woftam1

    woftam1 Active Member Full Member

    1,316
    0
    Jul 6, 2011
    Pac def.

    Early in their careers it could be called close but right now i think Pac is well ahead
     
  3. slugger3000

    slugger3000 You Mad Bro? Full Member

    32,620
    3
    Jul 19, 2010
    Who's voting for EM? Fanboys and *****s! LOL
     
  4. elTerrible

    elTerrible TeamElite General Manager Full Member

    11,392
    18
    May 24, 2006
    more people hate floyd than pac
     
  5. tinorknitz

    tinorknitz Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,346
    1
    Jun 6, 2010
    But the poll asks who is ranked higher and not who is loved more. If you visit that thread, you could see that people picking Morales over Floyd has a very good argument. It's not just HATE, Floyd's resume really is to blame.
     
  6. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    No they dont. Post one good argument why Floyd's resume let alone skill is not vastly superior to Morales. Outside of Pac and Barrera, Floyd's legacy is deeper with more champions beaten over more divisions. Floyds level of difficulty is far superior.
     
  7. thanosone

    thanosone Love Your Brother Man Full Member

    6,495
    2,437
    Sep 23, 2007
    The first Barrera fight was a good win. Name another. Don't say JMM, because he got a gift.
     
  8. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    I love EM as much as the next guy, but come on man.... Pac is Pac.
     
  9. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    No it's not, and you've had it thrown in your face and explained as if to a child many, many times. You're the biggest ***** on the board and there's really no point in talking to you about it, but I suppose you take that as a compliment.

    You prob sit at home burning $1.00 bills on your porch lol

    Funny thing is that most of the votes for Erik on this poll are from *****s trying to lash out at Pac. EM fans have more class and more common sense.
     
  10. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    You havent said **** bald fat man.

    Even Addie and Popkins said Morales isnt close to Floyd and they hate Floyd. But they jist is they know about boxing to be objective.


    Please explain it to me why Morales is better, despite Floyd winning titles in more divisions, beating more champions and having the deeper resume and more dominating career.

    Please tell me how Morales is better then Floyd who was pound for pound pretty much since he started boxing.
     
  11. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    Why bother? It was explained to you a thousand times in the original poll thread. Anything you don't like, you just pretend you don't see it. For instance: Pac and MAB are both better victories than anyone on Floyd's resume. -- now let's all watch you ignore that.

    It gets old.
     
  12. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    Already addressed that fat man. Barrera and Pacman are better then anything on Floyds resume. What does that have to do with Floyd being dominant longer, beating a deeper stable of fighters, beating more champions, winning titles in more divisions and being overall just the better fighter?


    Give it up fat man. You dont know **** about baxin.
     
  13. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    cherrypicking your way thru weight divisions fighting guys like Gatti and Baldomir doesn't equal a Pacquiao style rampage thru the weightclasses. Floyd RETIRED rather than fight any tough welterweights after he got his paper title. He hasn't been dominant since his LW days. He doesn't deserve to be mentioned in the same sentence as Morales or Pacquaio. That's how I see it. That's how history will see it. Now suck on that.
     
  14. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    :lol: YOu'd suck Gatti's dick if given the chance fat man.


    What about Corrales and CAstillo. The 2 greatest lightweights other then Floyd of that generation? What about a 154lb Oscar De La Hoya coming off a KO. Mosley coming off a KO. Ortiz 10 years his junior coming off a sensational win. Hell even the average guys Floyd fought like Chavez, Hernandez, Famoso, Ndou, Corley were top level contenders for years.
    You mean like David Diaz. Hey fatman, what would a prime CAstillo have done to David Diaz? :rofl

    4 of Pacquiao's last 7 opponents are guys Floyd already beat. Heard the entire spiel before fatman.
    The tough welterweights? Like Margarito, who Mosley KO'd?
    Losing a handful of rounds, while facing 6 straight champions, 5 of which were coming off big victories, 4 of which coming of KO wins, 3 of which ranked in the top 10 pound 4 pound, is not dominant?


    Please tell me fat man, why is he ranked number 2 pound 4 pound by the ring if he hasnt been dominant?


    Nope. Mayweather is already ranked by the vast majority of historians ahead of Morales. And Vegas has Mayweather the favorite to beat Pacquiao.
     
  15. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    Like I said, all been explained ad nauseum, everybody but you and about a dozen other hardcore *****s accept it. You keep trying to write these page long posts full of bull****, but I told you I wouldn't be wasting my time with them again after I read the first one. I didn't even get past the first quote. You mad, bro??