ATG: Who Ranks Higher? Manny Pacquiao or Sugar Ray Leonard?

:nut

 

Let's ask this question.
Again, I'm still on the fence, but which win is bettter.
Sugar Ray vs Lalonde
or
Pacquaio vs Margarito????

 

Pac-Cheato!

 

Oh my days. Leonard has an argument for being one of the most complete fighters in history.

His victories over hearns, hagler and duran alone eclipse pac's career so far. We are talking genuine all time great opponents.

To top it pac would have to beat floyd and martinez minimum. Perhaps unify the 154 division also.

 

It's undeniable that Pac is a superior weight-jumper to SRL and has had greater longevity, but literally everything else is strongly in Ray's favour: resume and ability being the two most important factors anyway. It just has to be SRL by a clear margin, no matter which way you look at it.

 

Pac's Hagler, Hearns & Duran were MAB, EM & JMM!

So Who's SRL's DLH, Cotto & Hatton? Pac still has Mosley & Floyd to come!

 

Are you an absolute ******?

No seriously, are you ******ed? You are unbelievably ignorant, do you think anybody actually takes you seriously? You're posts are some of the most ignorant and deluded on here. I laughed at your suggestion that Sugar Ray Leonard, one of the top 10-15 greatest fighters of all time, needed a 'Ricky Hatton' on his resume. Are you paid by someone to come on here and spout this bull****?

Words fail me...............

 

I got that From Pacdbest book! He answered this question 3 years ago. Pac has accomplished more that what was asked then!

 

Tommy Hearns would beat the dog **** out of Pac and/or anyone on Pac's resume.

 

What does that prove though? Michael Spinks would beat the dog **** out of Tommy Hearns and/or anyone on Hearns's resume, because although Hearns fought at lightheavy he was no lightheavy, and nor were the vast majority of his career opponents.

 

On his day hearns could've possible beaten everyone

 

Wow your ******ness is coming to play in a huge way. Hearns, Duran were both basically in their primes when they fought Leonard. Leonard tko Duran in a rematch and tko a prime Hearns in one of the greatest fights. Who has Pacquiao beat at ww that is even close to a prime Hearns? <<I dare you to answer that question. And lmfao @ you for even say Hagler, Duran, Hearns were Mab, Em, Jmm. <<<That's a ******ed comment i have ever read.

 

Pac/Margo easy:yep

Leonards win against Lalonde was a farce as LaLonde had a penalty of $1MILLION for every pound he came in over 168, He was weight crippled just to feed Leonards ego so that he could beat Hearnd to be the 1st too 5 title's in diff weight classes.....he failed as Tommy beat him to it 2 nights earlier when he beat Kinchen.

Leonard pulled the same stunt for the Duran/Leonard III when Roberto would be fined $1MILLION for every ****in OUNCE he came over 160, this was the secret conditions that Leonard laid down to LaLonde/Hearns & Duran if they wanted a payday against the arch manipulator.

Duran had a huge IRS bill of nearly $3MILLION of back taxes to pay & the U.S. Gov revoked his exit visa so he could.nt leave the states so he's agreed to anything that Leonard demanded regardless of the conracted weight of 163 that was just for public consumption but the reality was 160 & Duran was so paranoid about the $$$$ he starved himself down to 158.5 at the weigh-in just to be on the safe side $$$$ wise & in doing so ended up getting shafted by the WBC who stripped Duran of his 160 title stating that he lost to Leonard at Middleweight seeing that Leonard came in at 160 for his 168 crown so work that double dealing **** out.

I was at the weigh-in at the Mirage when Arum yelped that seeing that Duran was inside the Middleweight limit & Leonard was bang on 160 then i presume it's for BOTH title's. Uproar ensued from Duran's camp stating that the contract was for Leonards Super/Middle title, but Duran got shafted double thanks the Leonards rotten ways in manipulating the weights & with the disgracefull wholesale backing of the WBC who got paid off handsomely for bowing to the demands of boxings new catchweight high queen of drame in Leonard.

Least we forget he did the same too Hearns with another $1MILLION fine for every pound over 163.......

Now imagine if Pacquiao had stipulated that Cotto had to weigh in at 145 or Margo at 147.5 (But privatly agree to come in at 141 & 146 respectivly) He would have been slaughtered but THATS WHAT LEONARD did to LaLonde/Hearns & Duran & the **** gets idiots on here still cooing over him & thats obviously down to the fact that they absolutly know ****-all about that charlatan weight rigging ****......Leonard/LaLonde = FARCE & made for the comsumption of the Michael Jackson/WWF/Boxing casual fan base that made up Leonards followers......Wankers:deal

 

Hey ******, 160 and over is clearly not Leonards weight and he was way past his prime lol. Leonard tko a prime Hearns at ww. Who has Pacquiao beat at ww that is even close to a prime Hearns?

 

Here follow this thread that was started n 2007: Maybe u forgot what was expected of Pac then. Pac was supposed to be no match with Hatton, DLH, Cotto, & Margarito! Look now?? Floyd's ducking!

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=16153