ATG: Who Ranks Higher? Terence Crawford or Joe Calzaghe

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by asero, Jan 4, 2024.


ATG: Who Ranks Higher?

This poll will close on May 21, 2051 at 11:20 PM.
  1. Terence Crawford

    74 vote(s)
    54.8%
  2. Joe Calzaghe

    61 vote(s)
    45.2%
  1. Ice8Cold

    Ice8Cold The Hype Job Spotter. Full Member

    3,236
    4,887
    Jan 1, 2024
    Eubank and Hopkins were quite past their best days but I get your argument though.
     
  2. Ice8Cold

    Ice8Cold The Hype Job Spotter. Full Member

    3,236
    4,887
    Jan 1, 2024
    Spence was a special victory plus the manner of victory but I agree he needs a couple more victories
     
  3. Dynamicpuncher

    Dynamicpuncher Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,069
    33,625
    Jan 14, 2022
    Agreed but look at what Hopkins achieved after losing to Calzaghe, and even Eubank moved up two weightclasses and came within a whisker of beating Cruiserweight champion in one of his best performances in years.

    Some might say with the inactivity of Spence and after suffering car crashes, that Hopkins and Eubank were in better form than Spence despite being older.
     
  4. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    60,129
    5,614
    Nov 5, 2013
    Tc... lmfao.

    Not even all that close tbh.

    2 weight undisputed, and much more dominant too.

    He has never had a close fight, ever.
     
    Homericlegend03 and Joeywill like this.
  5. vast

    vast Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,988
    19,894
    Nov 27, 2010
    Calzaghe and it’s not even close. The ATG SMW.
     
    Perkin Warbeck likes this.
  6. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,331
    38,069
    Jul 4, 2014
    Maybe Crawford by a hair for beating his great rival in his prime, but then again his great rival sucked. Its an either way kind of thing.
     
    Last edited: Jan 5, 2024
    gollumsluvslave likes this.
  7. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,349
    29,583
    Apr 4, 2005
    Both long reigning dominant champions. I think Calzaghe fought the slightly better opposition. Yes Crawford is undisputed at 2 weights but that's just belts, if Calzaghe had been undisputed at 168 and 175 and done so beating the exact same opposition it doesn't mean his resume would be better it would just mean he had more belts. So in the end for me it's who you beat not what belts you collect.

    So right now I'm leaning towards Calzaghe but Crawford's career isn't over and it wouldn't take that much for him to surpass Calzaghe resume in my opinion. While he'll probably never beat anyone as good as even an old Bhop at 154 if he can add enough depth to his resume he can tip the scales to his favour in this comparison.
     
    Loudon and gollumsluvslave like this.
  8. Grinder

    Grinder Dude, don't call me Dude Full Member

    5,897
    2,607
    Mar 24, 2005
    Calzaghe would have destroyed Ottke, albeit not on the cards in Geemany. JC missed a couple of opportunities on his resume but he is still ahead of Bud's paper thin resume.
     
    Perkin Warbeck likes this.
  9. Mike_Jones

    Mike_Jones New Member banned Full Member

    67
    98
    Oct 16, 2023
    Considering they are nearly the same size & Calzaghe didn't drain down to beat on LWWs & WWs I'd say Joe...
     
    Perkin Warbeck likes this.
  10. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,373
    309
    Jan 8, 2009
    Do you think Calzaghe can KO Ottke the same way Crawford did to Spence and Shawn Porter?
     
  11. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    76,107
    40,656
    Jan 22, 2015
    Crawford definitely.
     
    Homericlegend03 likes this.
  12. TheShellofKell

    TheShellofKell Nakatani Future P4P #1 Full Member

    1,300
    1,558
    Sep 3, 2021
    Calzaghe's resume is so far superior its not even funny. Crawford for all his skills has a terrible resume. So Calzaghe by miles.
     
    Perkin Warbeck likes this.
  13. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,572
    11,079
    Jul 28, 2009
    That's different. Ottke was far more dangerous than Spence.
     
  14. ashishwarrior

    ashishwarrior I'm vital ! Full Member

    34,378
    11,872
    Apr 19, 2010
    Crawford
    No self doubt that joe was riddled with
     
  15. FastSmith7

    FastSmith7 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,462
    9,597
    Sep 16, 2017
    Crawford

    Both have average resumes for their quality but Crawford is a more skilled boxer and Spence is by some distance better than anyone on Calzaghes resume.