Attention Margarito defense attorneys. Here is your argument

Damn freddy, your wife would get it!...ha the picture of the baby with the boxing glove is adorable too..

 

Why is it you only choose to believe certain people from Margos camp but when his own co manager says something, its not true.

 

i'm just messin with scar, i love how he hates that most people on here know me and know i aint no lying piece of ****....

i especially love how he hates that i post pics


i'm done with him though......lets move on



RUDYARD
they are gonna fight the suspension, that's what this thread is all about......

 

Actually Epinoza did say that...that was a quote taken from an interview with him and I believe it is almost word for word....so if you're gonna believe Capetillo you kind of have to believe Epinoza right?

 

who am i choosing to believe....:huh

i know somebody that went to the hearing and he wrote an article on it....

he said tony looked ****en clueless to everything that was going on...

he said capetillo apologized for putting an old pad in margos wrap...never said he pre-treated it

he also said that nazim and the csac reps apologized for letting over 15 people mess with it before finally boxing it up and sending it off...

he said that margo and his team had no clue of the pad until the night before when they were told.....


i mean, so many ****en questions eze, and since the beginning this has all been shady, so i aint letting go until the case is fought and closed by both sides, not just one

 

bro, i dont even know who espinoza is.....

from what i know, capetillo, margo and sergio were the ones answering questions.....

 

wow, not too many people are interested in getting to the truth of the matter. that is a bit sad when its comming from so called fans of the sport. i could see some mma fans taking this opportunity to bury a guy who really hasnt been proven to be guilty of the crime he is accused of. drug possesion is a crime but it is wrong to convict a guy of sale and distribution of a controled substance when all they got for proof is a roach of weed. yea they are both crimes but let the punishment fit the crime. they havent even said they found a roach, they said they found some thc residue. now everyone wants margo to be allright with being called a drug pusher because selling drugs and having a roach are both crimes. how about a little perspective here.

 

Show me in the rule book were its ok to place any type of pre-treated gauze in your gloves?

We both can play that game!:good

 

Dude, he didnt follow the rules period! That part is obvious...thats why he's getting all of this heat because he was caught doing something he wasnt suppose to be doing. If he would have just followed the guide lines and the rules of the CSCA, we would not be having this conversation.

 

so ****en true man....

 

thats a whole lot different than saying margo is putting plaster in his gloves which is what you have been selling.

 

I like how FanMan gets technical and says they didn't discover plaster they discovered common substances.

Well dont you think if they were substances from a handcream sulfur which someone said if completely different from the type of sulfur used in plaster that they would identify that too? but they didn't saying that it leads to plaster.