Attention Margarito defense attorneys. Here is your argument

so you can think i'm full of ****, yet you dont even know me....but the minute i question a man (nazim) who's admitted to trying to blemish someones name (tito), i'm a fool

 

He spoke with the receptionist!!!!


There is no female official in that office that would have divulged any information!!!

 

Let's say that Floyd was in this situation, would you even be defending him with this argument that you are putting up for Margo?

 

She was a dumb ***** though, I mean, if someone can't remember the rules of their work who's to say she knew how many wraps they had. She's a receptionist

 

it's possible....
that's why i asked bro...

 

Damn this is a long ass thread, so have we decided if Margo is guilty or not?

 

I know but you kind of ****ed yourself with the argument there

 

**** yeah...

one thing i can't stand is shady **** bro...and from the beginning, this has been some shady ****...

 

Lets make it official....

Margie is a guilty *******....case closed!!!!!

 

Well it started with.


1. Margo doesn't know!

then

2. It was hand cream!

then

3. Not have hand cream, fungal cream!

then

4. Baby powder and some roots in a garden!

then

5. Baby powder and tea!

then

6. BABY POWDER AND BAKING SODA!!!!!!

then

7. They only tested one wrap!

 

How about if it was " Scar " ?

 

No, thats up the jury.(us posters) Have you reached a verdict yet??

 

call yourself and find out...i think her name is stacey or some **** like that

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

This content is protected

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl