This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected
can't wait to see it. You have an attribute scale, I have a resume breakdown, The forum has it's atg list averages. A wealth of HW info exists in the classic!
Great effort, but when you have Vitali 2nd and Tyson 23rd on the tally score, you lose a little credibility. The way you're scoring is so subjective as well. Height is not an attribute as such, but the ability to use that height to your advantage is. I seriously don't think Tyson would've been a better fighter had he been 6'2, he used the fact that he's quite short to his advantage effectively and thus should score well in that department. Similarly, what skill/advantage does Paul Williams have being tall when he doesn't use it at all?? The issue's the same with weight. Here you'd be saying that Chris Arreola scores more points then Ali just because he weighs more!?!? It's madness!!! Once again, great effort though.
Good work, Mendoza. Treating this as it is, the list is fairly ok because H2H the klit bros both rank very high. the two surprises, actually, on my part are the placings of Louis and Liston. I know Louis is in the top 10 but for me he seems an obvious choice to be the top of any H2H/skill set list. Liston is usually ranked very highly because his whole ranking is almost soley based on this kind of thing with the belief he'd beat anyone bar Ali of that era. I can live with Tyson being low because whilst I think peak Tyson is a H2H nightmare for anyone, it isn't exactly controversial to believe the opposite. Great effort.
This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected
interested to see the outcome of it all, should be funny at least. like heavyweight dungeons and dragons.
The link of the results should be working. If not, I can create a new one. [url] This content is protected [/url]
Somebody somewhere has to polish the diamond.1 big thing and a huge factor here not mentioned is the trainer/manager. Jack Blackburn and Charlie Goldman and Angie Dundee and so on, just don't see their guys lose a lot of title fights, do they? By far, the guy with the weakest corner was Liston. I wonder how some other careers would have panned out if they had mediocre trainers and managers instead of excellence? For example, anybody really think Marciano does as well w/o Weill/Goldman affiliation?