Sorry mate...you get no say in this as you failed to bet :tong At the end of the day it's my thread so I make up the rules I think it's only fair that the members involved in the vote appoint a panel of 5 members (not involved in the betting) to vote on the outcome if its not clear cut on the scales. In all fairness the intention of the bet was to see Mundine get on the scales in front of Phil Austin (a fair and equitable judge) so we all would know what he weighed. This new chain of events was never in the bet :hi:
C'mon Ash, you're behaving like Mandy now, looking for any angle to get out of something which you can't win. tong
No mate technically your wrong....review first post of thread.....one of the conditions to the bet was Phil Austin will be the judge.....if the IBO title is not up for grabs then Phil wont be there to judge and bet is void.
Semantics mate, **** poor form. I woulda expected better, but should have known from a Mandy supporter. :tired
nowhere here does it say anything specifically about the IBO.....phil can still be the judge IMO and...........i think your **** ash you said mundine must make weight for the fight against medley...if you said title fight you would have a leg to stand on :hey
Lets just see how things unfold in the next few days.....I hope it's straight forward. As you know I wanted the bet to be about Mundine on the scales in front of Phil Austin who will tell the truth Im not running out on the bet and I'm willing to submit to a panel of my peers when the final official word is out. :deal I would select upstanding unbiased members like Ippy, WAR, CHB, Contendo and yes Marcus....Phil as well if hes interested. These fine posters will look passed my nut hugging and judge based on facts alone and I'm sure I will be free to use my own avatars :yep
well if your going to give me some credit as a respectable poster i may go with no bets to stand :think
and didnt ash himself also add that he wouldnt talk about mundine for two months if choc didnt make weight :happy