Aww the poor Klit-ites

Yes, be sure to add the incredible Raging Bull, Taurus Sykes! Without his name being mentioned, it just wouldn't induce the raw FEAR into the Awesome Oaf's upcoming opponents' minds.

Only to be fair (because we all know the insecure Klitschko haters are fair), be sure to add Fabio Moli's name to Klitschko's list. After all, he's a lot better than "Seven Knockouts" Taurus Sykes.

 

You're right. Any other referee would've disqualified the Ambling Oaf.

First fight: Klitschko UD 12 Cheater

Second fight (hopefully VERY soon): Klitschko TKO Cheater

 

Why is this so hard for you guys to understand?

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

 

Peter will punch you in the back of the head if you pull that mess.

 

And holy ****... I just realized that you called Taurus Sykes a CHAMP!! :rofl He won the Vacant NABA Title right before he lost to Peter. "A younger Champ":rofl

 

Iggy, Byrd (3 years ago), Brock, or Brewster would beat any of the guys on Peter's list. The sad thing is that McCline is most likely the best guy on that list at this point in time. McCline just lost to Ruiz, and Byrd and Brock already beat him too. Toney just won a Split Decision over a bum, and Oleg would be easily beat by Iggy, without a doubt. Would never lay a glove on Byrd with his slow ass punches either. Hawkins and Long?:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl

It's funny how you say **** like "Brewster did not come to fight". "Iggy did not throw a punch"... Yet, fail to realize that neither of those guys have EVER done that before. You know why? Because Wlad FORCED Brewster to fold up shop, and FORCED Iggy to hold his punches. It sure as hell isn't as if they guys are taking Wlad lightly and forgot to train. Hell, you don't even have any ground to talk **** on Ray Austin. The man hadn't lost a fight in almost 6 years going into that fight. That is much better standing than Peter's opponents.

 

Sykes was a younger champ, as compared to an old nothing in Hawkins...hey, I freely admitted the guy was no world beater.

Thanks 4 answering the question like a complete ass. I said why did you pick those guys...??? "After Wlad," would have been a fine answer.

Don't gloat so much over nothing...you are wrong frequently enough.

 

I disagree that I am wrong frequently enough. Only because I only speak on things that I am sure that I know the facts about.

However, I agree that I was a bit harsh in my response. My apologies.

 

Looks as if Don King is trying to get Peter out of fighting Vitali, but Vitali has the legal rights, so will Vitali have to take it to court? He has a written agreement from the WBC to fight Peter. Don King does not want Peter to fight either Klitschko, he knows what will happen.

 

2 Words : Felix Sturm

You speak on that , and you are clearly wrong. However, no need to drag you over the pit of desparation that is DLH fandom, when his robbery of Sturm is brought up. Another time...Another thread...

Accepted...:good

 

Peter is running from Vitali and Vlad. HBO could not get a commitment from either King or Peter. I could have told them that.

 

Peter, confident after his victory over Maskaev, said that he would fight both brothers in the same night.


SOURCE: Tim Smith, boxing columnist for the New York Daily News

special to ESPN.com

 

I think that Sam Peter would fight anyone. He doesn't strike me as somebody who would duck anyone. However, I can see Don King making a unification fight extremely difficult.

 

Peter said on thing, but HBO could not get a commitment, they said they were disappointed. Peter should put his signature where his mouth is ASAP.

However, Vitali can force a fight with Peter in court. He has a signed agreement from the WBC.

 

Peter better make an agreement to get some money if and when Brittley pulls out due to injury.

Wlad should beat him again in a rematch by the way, this time maybe easier.