Aww the poor Klit-ites

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Ambition_Def, Mar 8, 2008.


  1. WiDDoW_MaKeR

    WiDDoW_MaKeR ESB Hall of Fame Member Full Member

    37,427
    89
    Jul 19, 2004
    You must have missed most of the fight. Let me recap.


    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected



    Glad I could help.
     
  2. Suge Green

    Suge Green Boxing Junkie banned

    7,678
    3
    Sep 15, 2006
    You did help...clear your head a minute and think about how this started...

    ..you said KLIT didn't sit on his punches and hit Peter with the kind of shots he hit others with.

    Now you post a gang of KLIT nailing Peter pics...think about it.

    Thanks 4 the help.
     
  3. WiDDoW_MaKeR

    WiDDoW_MaKeR ESB Hall of Fame Member Full Member

    37,427
    89
    Jul 19, 2004
    Wlad never turned his back, genius... and Wlad didn't apply armlocks.:lol: Wrapping around the arms is part of a clinch. Where are fighters supposed to clinch? Around the neck? Around the face? I know that Peter clinched Wlad around his legs, but normally this is done by grabbing the arms and around.
     
  4. WiDDoW_MaKeR

    WiDDoW_MaKeR ESB Hall of Fame Member Full Member

    37,427
    89
    Jul 19, 2004
    I never said that Klitshko didn't nail Peter... and I never said that Peter had a weak chin either, I was defending his chin. You guys are too crazed to know how to take a compliment... which is why it always ends up like this. Wlad nailed Peter several times, and for the most part, Peter took them very well. I have said that a million times. However, Wlad didn't sit on his punches like he has in most of his knockouts. He was looking to land, and protect. He fought smart and got exactly the sort of win that he needed at that point in his career.
     
  5. Ambition_Def

    Ambition_Def **** the people. Full Member

    8,161
    3
    Feb 4, 2006
    Of course he did. You just have eyes for the big man rather than his actions.

    He consistently pulled Sam in, locked up his left arm and turned his head away from the right. Time and time again. I won't keep going back over this as it is an irrefutable FACT.
     
  6. Suge Green

    Suge Green Boxing Junkie banned

    7,678
    3
    Sep 15, 2006
    ...and then you posted pics proving yourself wrong.
     
  7. Madison

    Madison I must break you. Full Member

    184
    0
    Jul 28, 2006
    There's an armlock and then there's tactical clinching. It's okay, you can read up on the differences.

    And Klitschko did not intentionally turn his back on his WWE opponent. This is the only "excuse" Klitschko haters can use to defend Peter's blatant and amateurish illegal blows the the back of the head. What would you know, Peter has a habit of hitting behind the head in all of his fights.

    Awwww. Klitschko fights intelligently and still cracks Peter's egg. Mabye next time he'll stand in front of the oaf with his arms down, looking up at the ceiling?

    One can always dream. And clearly you are not exempt.

    Sorry, they're still covering Peter's eyes.

    Oh, I almost forgot ----> Klitschko UD 12 Peter :hi:
     
  8. WiDDoW_MaKeR

    WiDDoW_MaKeR ESB Hall of Fame Member Full Member

    37,427
    89
    Jul 19, 2004
    Yea, fighters normally turn their heads in a clinch. Is that the only boxing match you have seen? Sounds like it. What do you want them to do, face to face, and kiss? Fighters turn their heads in a clinch.There is a big difference between that, and turning your back to a fighter. Peter was swinging up and around behind Wlad back to hit him in the back of the head... that is illegal, no matter how many ways you try to seduce it.
     
  9. WiDDoW_MaKeR

    WiDDoW_MaKeR ESB Hall of Fame Member Full Member

    37,427
    89
    Jul 19, 2004
    Wow... just... wow.
     
  10. philby

    philby Active Member Full Member

    1,314
    0
    Aug 15, 2004
    I think Ambition def should calm down and take his medication!! These cheeky AD twelve year olds are annoying somtimes!! Sheeeeshh!!:patsch
     
  11. WiDDoW_MaKeR

    WiDDoW_MaKeR ESB Hall of Fame Member Full Member

    37,427
    89
    Jul 19, 2004
    :lol:
     
  12. Ambition_Def

    Ambition_Def **** the people. Full Member

    8,161
    3
    Feb 4, 2006
    Yea turn his head in a clinch he initiated.

    Get over it Window, your boy is a much bigger OFFENDER of the rules than Sam Peter. And it's a fact that can no longer be ignored.
     
  13. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    The children here are very ignorant of boxing, they don't know any better.

    Peter looked terrible tonight, he is a sitting duck for Vitali or Vlad. Notice they could not get Don King or Peter to commit. Peter landed punches to the back of the head over and over as usual.
     
  14. philby

    philby Active Member Full Member

    1,314
    0
    Aug 15, 2004
    Yes ring magazine said Peter constantly hit behind the head!! We must believe the gods of ring magazine!!:think ;)
     
  15. WiDDoW_MaKeR

    WiDDoW_MaKeR ESB Hall of Fame Member Full Member

    37,427
    89
    Jul 19, 2004
    Wrong, Wlad didn't break any rules.

    Also, Sam Peter is breaking a rule that is an EXTREMELY dangerous rule to break. You aren't allowed punching in the back of the head, because it can easily cause severe brain damage. Quite a bit worse of a rule to break... than clinching... which isn't even a rule.:good