Axel Sсhulz vs Tommy Morrison

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Big Ukrainian, Aug 28, 2020.


Who would win - Shulz or Morrison?

  1. Shulz by KO/TKO

    5.6%
  2. Shulz by decision

    22.2%
  3. Morrison by KO/TKO

    72.2%
  4. Morrison by decision

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  5. Draw

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. Big Ukrainian

    Big Ukrainian Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,647
    9,469
    Jan 10, 2007
    Who would have won this fight?
     
    Last edited: Aug 28, 2020
  2. Noel857

    Noel857 I Am Duran Full Member

    9,924
    12,919
    Mar 24, 2019
    Morrison could box his way to a win replicating his Foreman performance but more likely to KO Schulz later on
     
  3. Big Ukrainian

    Big Ukrainian Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,647
    9,469
    Jan 10, 2007
    I don't think so - Sсhulz had great chin and excellent stamina. Morrison surely hit much harder, but had awful chin and bad stamina. Plus I don't understand why people always bring Foreman fight in mythycal match ups for Morrison. Tommy never boxed that way before or since
     
    Last edited: Aug 28, 2020
  4. CharlesBurley

    CharlesBurley Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,065
    1,880
    Feb 23, 2020
    Morrison KO or Schulz UD
     
  5. Charlietf

    Charlietf Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,935
    2,503
    Feb 25, 2020
    Please... Missmatch. Morrison by one sided beating
     
  6. Big Ukrainian

    Big Ukrainian Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,647
    9,469
    Jan 10, 2007
    He couldn't give a one-sided beating to Joe Hipp, shot Carl Williams or 8-8 Ross Puritty, all of whom were far worse comparing to Sсhulz
     
    Last edited: Aug 28, 2020
  7. Charlietf

    Charlietf Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,935
    2,503
    Feb 25, 2020
    Curiously you did not mention tillis, Pinklon Thomas or Ruddock
     
  8. Noel857

    Noel857 I Am Duran Full Member

    9,924
    12,919
    Mar 24, 2019
    Maybe agree about Schult`s chin perhaps i should have said Morrison stops him.No matter how the ending occurs their is only one winner here and its not Schultz
     
  9. AwardedSteak863

    AwardedSteak863 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,063
    11,267
    Aug 16, 2018
    I have Axel in this one. He was the much better boxer and was a more durable guy as well. He should have got the decision over Foreman and Arguably deserved it over Moorer as well.
     
    Big Ukrainian likes this.
  10. ideafix12

    ideafix12 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,011
    863
    Jul 30, 2010
  11. Charlietf

    Charlietf Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,935
    2,503
    Feb 25, 2020
    Jesucristo... :facepalm:
     
  12. AwardedSteak863

    AwardedSteak863 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,063
    11,267
    Aug 16, 2018
    Shulz was a highly decorated amateur on an international level before going pro. Look at his accomplishments there not to mention his wins as a pro. Morrison has the edge in power by quite a bit but I will always take a more seasoned boxer like Axel over a guy like Morrison who was inconsistent and flawed as hell.

    Not sure why you are continuing to overrate Morrison on every thread and then act like a dick when folks don't agree with you but it's getting a little old.
     
  13. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    29,650
    36,245
    Jan 8, 2017
    Decision win Tommy, very close fight. Morrison power is the ultimate selling point but plenty watching think Axel should have gotten the verdict.
     
  14. Cojimar 1946

    Cojimar 1946 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,767
    1,725
    Nov 23, 2014
    Tillis and Thomas were totally shot. How are these fights at all relevant?
     
  15. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,131
    44,903
    Mar 3, 2019
    So was Rudduck lmao