Morrison could box his way to a win replicating his Foreman performance but more likely to KO Schulz later on
I don't think so - Sсhulz had great chin and excellent stamina. Morrison surely hit much harder, but had awful chin and bad stamina. Plus I don't understand why people always bring Foreman fight in mythycal match ups for Morrison. Tommy never boxed that way before or since
He couldn't give a one-sided beating to Joe Hipp, shot Carl Williams or 8-8 Ross Puritty, all of whom were far worse comparing to Sсhulz
Maybe agree about Schult`s chin perhaps i should have said Morrison stops him.No matter how the ending occurs their is only one winner here and its not Schultz
I have Axel in this one. He was the much better boxer and was a more durable guy as well. He should have got the decision over Foreman and Arguably deserved it over Moorer as well.
Shulz was a highly decorated amateur on an international level before going pro. Look at his accomplishments there not to mention his wins as a pro. Morrison has the edge in power by quite a bit but I will always take a more seasoned boxer like Axel over a guy like Morrison who was inconsistent and flawed as hell. Not sure why you are continuing to overrate Morrison on every thread and then act like a dick when folks don't agree with you but it's getting a little old.
Decision win Tommy, very close fight. Morrison power is the ultimate selling point but plenty watching think Axel should have gotten the verdict.