Azteca TV had it 8-4 Golovkin

Drugnelo got the decision. Nobody is debating that.

We're debating whether the decision was legit.

It wasnt.

 

they were GGG's judges lmao

 

Did you have a hit of Saul's stash?

What's he on this time?

Sounds like it may be strong.

 

Sanchez didn't have GGG winning though. He said he had it even after the fight, but during the fight told GGG in the corner he was losing. That completely obliterates the idea that Canelo winning was a robbery when GGG's own trainer had him losing during the fight and after the fight said he had it even not GGG winning.

 

That's just stating that Canelo received the decision and he's fine with it. That's it.

For weeks now I heard the "Even Abel thought Canelo won" from Canelo's fanbase which quite iroinically you yourselves have now proven to be false.

 

Like a trainer never tells a fighter he's behind in order to motivate him? You're new to this, aren't you kid?

 

Exactly how I see it.

 

Abel knew that the Vegas style judging was going to have the house fighter ahead. I would have told Golovkin the same thing.

 

Ol Drugnelo is probably doing lines as we speak, while Shadow draws them out for him

 

haha so your argument is that Sanchez was lying to GGG telling him he was losing to motivate him, when he really thought he was winning, but then in the interview after the fight he made it clear that he didn't think GGG was winning since he had it a draw. of course trainers say stuff to motivate their fighter but Sanchez's post fight comments make it clear that he did think GGG was losing because he said he needed the last 3 rounds. So anotherwords he only had the fight even after GGG came on in the 10th and had his rally, and even then it was only enough to have the fight even according to Sanchez.

 

But then after the fight you would have said GGG won right. But that's not what Sanchez said, he made it clear GGG was losing and GGG only did enough to make the fight even with the late rally.

BCS8 you can't escape or get around the fact that GGG's own trainer didn't even have him winning lol ! If it was such a robbery as you claim surely the fighter who you are defending's own trainer would have had him winning !

 

Well technically Abel thought Canelo was winning during the fight. Or at least that's what he told GGG. Now you can make the argument that he was lying to his fighter to motivate him (which is a stretch but possible) but then after the fight Sanchez stating that he had the fight even proves that he wasn't lying to GGG that he really thought he was losing and needed the late rounds just to get a draw.

 

To me the farce was apparent even before the fight when during the broadcast they kept going non stop how GGG will have to KO him or go for broke in order to get the decision. You know it's bad when the TV station which has a professional standard to uphold has zero problems saying there will be crookery involved in this event.

I've never seen such a thing in any other sport, "Oh this team will have to score 5 goals to receive a victory, that's just how it goes".

 

Yeah okay but saying that he was losing mid fight is not the same as thinking they lost the fight. Which he doesn't think, as he thought it was a draw. So he himself doesn't agree with the decision even if he accepts it because his scorecard does not have Canelo winning.

 

Right but he doesn't see it as a robbery. He accepted the decision that Canelo won, he recognized what Canelo did in the ring unlike the vast majority of GGG fans who don't concur with Sanchez's view of the fight that it was a draw or that close to a Canelo win. In the first fight Sanchez had no problem saying GGG won, not this time. That's telling and suggests that the 2nd fight isn't anywhere close to a robbery. If the trainer of the losing fighter isn't even confident enough to say that he thought his fighter won, then I don't see how you can argue it was a robbery.