as similar as they may seem to you, the fact still remains that morales has the better resume. i'm not gonna argue with 2-1 b/c all 3 were close absolute ****ing classics. but i will bring up junior jones X 2. morales is better than barerra :deal
if morales doesnt beat pacquiao...MAB>EM but morales beats pac and that is his best win while his 2nd fight was his downfall
Erik Morales has a better resume, but Marco won the thrilogy and therefore, as far as I'm concerned, that evens out the playing field. I always felt Marco possessed one of the greatest skillsets in all of Mexican Boxing history, and that is why I give my preference too him. He put combination's together, and finishes guys in such a manner, that Morales was seemingly incapable of doing. I don't like saying either one is better though, because they both made each other as great as they were.
A young Morales was a beast from hell. The first Pac fight is my favorite out of his career with the first MAB fight second.
a real warrior. if he was not fighting pac in his last few fights, i would root for him. but still, i did partially root for morales in the first fight since i have some money riding on him on that one.
el terrible!!! and pac-man. two of the best in their generation. both warriors, willing to go battle. what can we say, except thank you. **** man, that fights that EM fought was really for the ages. never had a mentality of running or riding a bike while in the ring. truly world class warrior.
This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected Gracias Erik