Bantamweight Tournament Round 1: Miguel 'Happy' Lora vs Jeff Fenech

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by GPater11093, Dec 28, 2010.


  1. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    McGrain, a brief stylistic analysis will do.

    Aint seen the Avelar fight, just the Sanchez and Zaragoza ones.
     
  2. emanuel_augustus

    emanuel_augustus Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,905
    14
    Jul 27, 2004
    Was the Zaragoza fight closer than the scorecards?? That wide margin is a bit surprising to me.
     
  3. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    544
    Feb 17, 2010
    It was a one sided clinic for the most part.
     
  4. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    One sided, I think I gave Zaragoza the 1st and that was that.
     
  5. emanuel_augustus

    emanuel_augustus Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,905
    14
    Jul 27, 2004
    I didn't realize it was on youtube. Hardly a one-sided clinic. Fenech fought well but Zaragoza had a bs point deduction and fought well in the middle and late rounds.

    Watch round seven. Wow!

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8csUAuJxcGY&feature=related[/ame]
     
  6. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    544
    Feb 17, 2010
    I think we thought you meant Zaragoza against Lora.
     
  7. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    78
    Apr 4, 2010
    Yeah, a sharp-shooter like Zaragoza (as he was then, at least) was always going to have more success offensively against a guy like Fenech than he was Lora. Against Lora his punches were slipped/rolled/deflected for what seemed like 90% of the time, and sharply countered quite often as well. A masterful display from the "Happy" one.
     
  8. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    Thread closed

    7-4 Fenech

    (El Buija why no voting?)
     
  9. holysmoker

    holysmoker Guest

    fenech at his best would have absolutely murdered any fighter between bantam and super feather in history why you think mike tyson loves him so much cause fenechs as bad as they come
     
  10. holysmoker

    holysmoker Guest

    fenech number 2 p4p of all time after les darcy number 3 peter jackson
     
  11. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    78
    Apr 4, 2010
    This is why:

    What does it matter when you have boners like him fudging up the poll?
     
  12. holysmoker

    holysmoker Guest

    its a true statement dickhead if he wasnt robbed against nelson would have been the first fighter to be cham at 4 different weights