There has been much speculation with regards to the possibility of this mouth watering match up. If it does happen, who do you think will win it? I've got to go for Macklin. Barker is certainly skilled but I don't think he can out box Macklin for 12 rounds. Macklin will pressure him and take him out in the later rounds. I think Macklin is just to big of a step up for Barker.
I think Barker would outbox him. Largely depends on his questionable chin though, to me he's shown he's more skilled and talented than Macklin even against lesser opposition. That's the problem, against lesser opposition you can't really learn about a guys toughness or how he reacts to bad situations.
Kelly we dont want to hear your opinion why, just make a choice Anyway I agree with you. It would be a semi decent spectacle with the fact that Macklin can dig and there will always be that danger but for me, he is a far better boxer. I like Macklin but in my opinion but (as it is in Britain) a good win against Asikainen has seen his stock rise tenfold and people get carried away again
That is fair enough. There are people who think Macklin can take Pavlik now. Which is ridiculous, although he has a decent chance of beating Sylvester imo. The same could be said about Barker though, he has fought very low level opposition and looks great but who knows how he will manage against Euro/ fringe world level boxer.
Maybe Macklin won't make it to the very top, but it is incredibly premature to say Barker is world class. He has fought nobody worth mentioning as of yet and his amateur record does not suggest a world class boxer. Maybe he will be but you can't really say if he is world class until he beats someone in the top 25 as least.
I was joking mate. This is one of the better sites to talk boxing online but its the same wherever you go, the london fans will say barkers the best and the irish/brummies will say macklins the best. Boxing skills , power, defence or whatever doesnt even come into the equation lol
Macklin's rep has gone through the roof after KO'ing Asikainen. Maybe we should stop and think about what took place that night. As good as the punch was from Macklin, Asikainen had no punch resistance. He'd probably seen better days, when he loses he tends to lose by KO even against average punchers like Gevor and Sylvester. I'm not discrediting Macklin entirely, it was an impressive victory but history probably suggests Macklin was made to look a lot more powerful than he actually is. Gevor and Sylvester themselves are a huge step up from that.
Asikainen was definitely over the hill by the time he took on Macklin but if Macklin connected that punch on Sylvester he would have been kissing the canvas too. It was a peach and Macklins ruthless finishing was very impressive. He did not allow himself to be hugged when going for the kill. I think Macklins power is definitely there. Since he moved up in weight he looks far more ferocious. He had Pintos down a few times from body shots too.
i think Barker would cause Macklin allot of problems with his quick jab. take an early lead and keep it going as macklin will get desperate and that will play into Barkers hands.
I think Barker would take the decision but I am not over confident of the result. Great fight for us fans.