Gave the first 2 rounds to Spada in the hope the fight would be close then realised it was going to be a shut out and gave the rest to Barker.
So slap prefers shots that land on gloves and arms to shots that actually land? Other than one solitary left in the second that seemed to catch Barker off balance Spada didn't do much at all.
Yeah good one Wallet! How did you score it again? [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDTNdXk5ots[/ame] I love it! How did Slap score it? er 118-110! What a biased ****! Shut up ya attention seeking wank! Barker is shite, there is more power in my wee mans farts. Lee or Macklin would knock the chinny overrated hype job out inside six rounds. :deal
Forgive me but it looked like Barker was the one landing against the gloves with **** weak jabs. If you think Spada only landed one shot in the first two rounds then you are an even bigger arselickin deluded Uncle Tom than even I had you down for. :good
Misquoting me again I see. When did I say he only landed one shot? Show me where I said it. Exactly where, don't swerve everything I bring up like you normally do. Point it out, or admit that once again you're talking bollocks. I think you'll find Barker landed a few left hands on the inside and some rights over the top. Which were more than adequate enough for him to win the first two seeing as Spada really wasn't doing much with his work being forced and ragged. But keep the insults coming, it's all you can come up with.
By referring to only one single shot that Spada landed you implied he didnt **** all else in the two rounds that would warrant him being given the opening rounds. However, I along with plenty of other - as well as pressumably the ringside judges - gave Spada the openers. Spada landed the more meaningful punches in the opening rounds - which is why I gave those rounds to Spada, Barker outworked him and Spadas workrate dropped off after that which is why I gave him the rest. All three judges gaves gave Spada more rounds than I did you tit!
Reading comprehension fails you yet again. Because, I think you'll find that if I meant that, I would say it. What I implied is what I posted in the first place, that other than that left hand there wasn't much he did that you could use to justify giving him the round. You've made a habit of misquoting me, I'm beginning to think that you do it purposefully. No, he didn't. And I'd say that to anyone who gave him both of the first two rounds. He threw winging shots, the majority of which with very little technique(i.e. taking a lot of the power from them) and on top of that the occasions he landed these punches were sparse. I'm talking to you, not the judges. We're discussing the first two rounds, not the rest..
Why are the Irish fans generally so biased towards their fighters? I slag ours off all the time And reserve the right to slag off 'Average' Andy Lee and Matthew 'Middle of the Road' Macklin, even if I do think Darren 'Desperately Lucky to make it past Euro Level' Barker is about the same as 'em. I would say Lee is the best put of the three because he has an above average dig. Barker has some skills, but little power. Macklin is ****ing garbage.
Koji Sato FTW :bbb :deal Why Macklin is getting a shot at Sturm without going through the man who gave him such Hell, I'll never know.
My reading comprehension is just fine, but you are being rather disingenuous if you think you post implied anything other than Spada only landed one, shall we say 'scoring', punch in the openers. If you didnt give him those rounds then fair enough, scoring a fight is a subjective art. But you didnt hear me slagging people who gave it the other way than I did until they attacked my scoring. But the sheer predictability of your post again is yawn makingly boring and Rob criticising my card despite it being identical to his is atsch Whats funny is the warped focus of your posts, borderline embarrassing. So how did you score the fight.