Barkley vs. Duran

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by KuRuPT, Nov 3, 2011.


  1. Vanboxingfan

    Vanboxingfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,591
    255
    Feb 5, 2005
    Have you read this thread from the beginning? If so, you would probably realize that most people considered Duran to be overweight as a middleweight, so the fact he was overweight and fighting guys who were much bigger and in most cases younger and taller, doesn't make him a natural middleweight. Probably he should have been fighting at either 147 or 154 during this period of time. In fact he probably never should have fought above 154. As you age your metabolism slows down and it's harder not to gain weight. This is over and above a tendency to change your eating habits for the worse, and focus more on work and family and less on being in shape.

    Hopkins is a huge exception to this rule, and Floyd and Wlad are pretty much in the same ball park.

    But back to the fight, I find it hard not to give Duran tons of credit for this win. You'd pretty much have to be a hater of the sport not to appreciate what he did that night.
     
  2. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,444
    Jun 30, 2005
    I had it Duran 115-112.

    Duran did have a tendency in the 80s to get some real generous scorecards (the closeness of the official cards against Hagler and Benitez), and got one ridiculous scorecard here too, one judge having it 118-112.

    But the decision was fair anyway IMO, even if the amounts he won by were insane.
     
  3. Vanboxingfan

    Vanboxingfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,591
    255
    Feb 5, 2005
    Yes, but the flip side is he lost a couple of close fights that I thought he should have been awarded the win.
     
  4. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,587
    Jan 30, 2014
    Which ones?
     
  5. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,386
    11,818
    Mar 19, 2012
    They both showed great chins the difference being in my view one guy Barkely was getting tagged clean while Duran was able to move his head better. Duran was walking him into clean counters. Duran took some clean shots too just not as many.
     
  6. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,386
    11,818
    Mar 19, 2012
    Probably Robbie Sims.
     
  7. Vanboxingfan

    Vanboxingfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,591
    255
    Feb 5, 2005
    Definitely.

    He also floor Paz in their first fight and lost a controversial decision. And in the first Camacho fight, the decision was so bad that SRL called it an early Christmas present.
     
  8. Vanboxingfan

    Vanboxingfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,591
    255
    Feb 5, 2005
    True enough, Duran was a master and moving his head with the punches and taking something off them so he never got hit clean as many thought, but that said, Barkley hit him with some might good body punches throughout the fight, and that punch in the 8th that spun Duran around would have floored many, many fighters.
     
  9. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,587
    Jan 30, 2014
    How did you score those fights?
     
  10. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,587
    Jan 30, 2014
    Difference is that Barkley never really learned how to defend himself or punch with precision. Basically a slowish tough guy with solid power and a ton of heart.