Barrera And Morales - Who Was The Greater Fighter?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by peter5, Oct 12, 2007.


  1. Stickandmove

    Stickandmove Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,710
    2
    Mar 13, 2006
    Would Morales have beaten the Hamed that Barrera beat though? MAB beat Hamed by boxing cautiously and intelligently; Morales would likely have gone for the KO and left himself open.

    I know Morales had an A+ chin in his prime, but Hamed had A+ power and may have been the one fighter who could have knocked out Morales. Thoughts?
     
  2. Theo

    Theo Active Member Full Member

    520
    0
    Jan 17, 2005
    its prob right... eric had way to much pride in his prime and would have almost certainly battled naz toe to toe, and boy that was a very stupid thing to do.

    i thini MAB was certainly a clever'er fighter, but eric was the more natural fighter.

    /Theo
     
  3. The Exile

    The Exile FUBAR Full Member

    833
    24
    Aug 17, 2004


    Morales would have KO'd Naz in my opinion.
     
  4. hooligan

    hooligan Millionaire Bum Full Member

    4,499
    10
    May 8, 2006
    morales would expose naz just like mab did for the joke he is...only difference is that naz gets ko'd imho
     
  5. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,964
    17,381
    Jul 19, 2004
    Except, MAB beat Morales 2 out of 3 (and in my opinion, he won all three).

    MAB > Morales

    :smoke
     
  6. Asterion

    Asterion Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,459
    20
    Feb 5, 2005
  7. kukoy

    kukoy Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,404
    0
    Jun 13, 2006
    I think this will boil down to on who has more fans. I've been reading a lot here in ESB and most posters are just blinded simply being too much of a fan.

    For me, the greater fighter I guess would be EM. But the one with the greater legacy would be MAB as MAB has fought all of them. Though may have not won all, but he did not leave any IFs.
     
  8. PacDbest

    PacDbest Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,181
    1
    May 7, 2006
    This is not Academic Achievements but about Boxing Legacy. Morales Beat Guys barrera cannot beat & He has more Cajones. The only thing that Barrera has more is they're Head to head Matchup. But still their fights are all close & Morales beat him once.
     
  9. PacDbest

    PacDbest Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,181
    1
    May 7, 2006
    The only guy Morales didn't fought is Marquez. But that fight was offered to Marquez, He just Priced himself out on this fight.
     
  10. Spitfire7

    Spitfire7 Gadfly Full Member

    4,498
    2
    May 18, 2007
    Morales. Warrior through and through. A very honorable one too...
     
  11. BewareofDawg

    BewareofDawg P4P Champ Full Member

    27,677
    184
    Apr 8, 2006
    I'd say Morales. Lets put it this way, if Morales retired after his victory over Pacman this wouldn't even be up for discussion.

    This is a very close one though. Barrera did beat him 2 out of 3.
     
  12. boxbox

    boxbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,220
    0
    Feb 4, 2006
    heart of a fighter definitely goes to EM, but the intelligent fighter was MAB..
    career wise..i'd say it was Barrera who'd come as more legendary. voted for MAB as it would prove better paperwise. i like EM more because MAB was such a dirty fighter..
     
  13. hooligan

    hooligan Millionaire Bum Full Member

    4,499
    10
    May 8, 2006
    Where not talking about head to head matchup, where talking about overall greatness.

    Morales beat fighters that completely decimated mab and that already is saying a lot...
     
  14. acb

    acb De Camaguey... Gavilan Full Member

    9,448
    4
    Jan 6, 2007
    His inferior little brother that kicked his ass 2 out of 3 times and broke his nose in the 3rd fight. :good
     
  15. acb

    acb De Camaguey... Gavilan Full Member

    9,448
    4
    Jan 6, 2007
    My answer is Barrera.

    But more importantly, anyone who says one or the other easily is just hating. They are too close as fighters to rate one dominantly higher than the other.