Barry Hearn on the Amir Khan and Paul McCloskey fight

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Samc1, Apr 19, 2011.


  1. pathmanc1986

    pathmanc1986 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,853
    5
    Oct 4, 2008

    thats not what you decreed though now is it?


    A total mismatch, blow out was your call. Not winning rounds or (LOL) the fight (?)

    The facts are that he dide fruastrate Khan. he did make him miss and he caught him on a couple occasions and got his attention and made him make amateurish mistakes. was he in the fight? No. Would he have gone on to win it had he not been the victim of a con job? No. but what happend and what you declared with dead certainty over the course of months were completely different. yet now you want to change the goalposts. im begining to realise that you maybe didnt have an axe to grind and are just a bit simple

    I just dont understand where you are coming from now. So il look foward to your next predictions and grand statements on the next big fight:bbb
     
  2. boxing4eva

    boxing4eva Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,382
    0
    Dec 3, 2009
    It was a total mismatch, if you think anything else you are deluding yourself. Did my prediction of Mccloskey being KO'd in the first few rounds come true, no. However that certainly doesn't mean I am going to congratulate Mccloskey on such a feat, if he had actually fought for 6 rounds, gotten cut and it been stopped then I would of.

    All this nonsense about "He was fustrating Khan" blah blah blah, "it was part of his master plan" is all a load of bollocks and holds about as much water as Khan saying "Doing **** against him for 6 rounds was all part of my plan".
     
  3. pathmanc1986

    pathmanc1986 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,853
    5
    Oct 4, 2008


    good


    we can agree on something then!