Barry Hunter On Khan & Co

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by RNS, Jan 11, 2012.


  1. RNS

    RNS Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,239
    0
    Jun 11, 2011
    By Barry Hunter
    "Unfortunately, we are in this process of dealing with these unfounded protests. It would be an understatement to characterize Lamont as being disappointed in the unprofessional manner in which Khan is attempting to discredit his performance in the ring and victory. We were raised to conduct ourselves where Champions display professionalism, both in victory and defeat. Lamont previously tasted defeat and handled it the way it should be handled – - he worked harder on areas that needed improvement to maximize his performance in the ring. Now, he is World Champion.
    Khan blames everyone and everything but his performance and lack of ability to make adjustments in the ring for his loss. He claims that the Ring Announcer privately stated he won, then that the referee’s discretionary actions should be overruled, then a mystery man in a black hat with no association to the Peterson Camp somehow affected the outcome of the bout, and also that the judges did not score the Bout correctly. Each claim is boldly false, but because Golden Boy and Khan have the financial resources to file protests and lawyers to create questionable accusations we are forced to address these issues. .We will not let these foul tactics take away from Lamont’s hard work, dedication and monumental victory. Furthermore, since Khan continues to focus on a man at ringside I want to be very clear– Mustafa Ameen is in no way, nor has he ever been affiliated or associated with anyone within Team Peterson. That includes myself, Lamont and Anthony Peterson.
    If the media reports are true, the WBA President personally believes there should be a direct rematch of the fight. This was oddly stated before an official review had taken place, as well as an official response or decision from the WBA review committee had been presented regarding the various protests and our formal submission. That makes me wonder what procedures were actually followed before the WBA President made these public statements? The Rules should be followed by everyone.
    Khan complains that the referee’s decisions should be overturned even though he continued to push Lamont throughout the fight. We believe the knockdown against Lamont was questionable but the rules give the referee that discretion on that call and we respect it.
    When Zab Judah filed protests for Khan’s repeated low blows in their July 2011 bout Golden Boy and Khan argued that a referee’s decisions should be honored. Now, Golden Boy and Khan are flip flopping on the referee’s decision when it’s not favorable towards them not the actions of a true champion.
    Immediately following our bout Golden Boy and Khan requested a meeting among us with the sanctioning organizations and the Boxing Commission. When we left the meeting Oscar De La Hoya, Bernard Hopkins and I agreed with the commission that the scorecards were correct and Lamont won the fight. Real Champions don’t continue to come up with various excuses and false accusations in hopes that something will stick to cover up for a loss.
    The bottom line is that after we decided not to accept Golden Boy’s offer for a rematch only days after the fight and said that Lamont wanted to enjoy the Holidays with his family and have time to make the best decision for his career and the future of his family; they started filing protest letters and trying to spin the media as some form of retaliation. If the media reports are true, then the actions of a few will put every close decision in boxing in jeopardy of being overturned. We will not let that happen. We will continue to fight for what is just and proper."




    thoughts?

    This content is protected
     
  2. 12downfor10

    12downfor10 Guest

    Why couldn't khan have hired someone to put his grievances across properly in a statement like this, rather than haphazardly and piecemeal like a ******ed child?
     
  3. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    24,013
    16
    Nov 29, 2007
    Nail. On. Head.

    **** Khan and Goldenboy and their attempted smear campaign. He lost because of flaws in his game and strengths in his opponents. Unless he recognises this and manages to address them sufficiently he'll lose the rematch too.

    **** Khan and Goldenboy.
     
  4. 12downfor10

    12downfor10 Guest

    And Hunters right, act like a champion Khan. Some humility woulda won (or kept) him some fans. Just ask for a rematch and get your head down
     
  5. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    24,013
    16
    Nov 29, 2007
    Exactly. I was a fan. Losing to Peterson would not have changed that. Reacting to the loss well would have enhanced that.

    The way he's reacted has turned me off him for life. He can lose the rematch and disappear into obscurity for all I care.

    Win like a champion. Lose like a champion.
     
  6. ashishwarrior

    ashishwarrior I'm vital ! Full Member

    34,378
    11,871
    Apr 19, 2010
    statement from hunter is bang on imo.
     
  7. Lazarus

    Lazarus Realist Full Member

    29,937
    1
    Jan 1, 2010
    Barry's a great dude.
     
  8. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    24,013
    16
    Nov 29, 2007
    Definitely. Hadn't seen much of him until Virgil Hill. Seems quality. Same goes for Virgil Hill
     
  9. Coldhearted

    Coldhearted Active Member Full Member

    1,009
    0
    May 17, 2010
    I think Khan even knows himself that Peterson may have deserved the fight as he really put everything into it the whole world could see it. I guess the fire ignited when Team Peterson rejected the rematch.
     
  10. Lazarus

    Lazarus Realist Full Member

    29,937
    1
    Jan 1, 2010
    Yeah. I was there at the presser in London when they came. Such down to earth people him and Lamont. Even when I told Lamont good luck for the fight, he really took it meaningfully and said thanks in a very nice way. Great people, for sure.
     
  11. dftaylor

    dftaylor Writer, fanatic Full Member

    20,730
    1
    May 7, 2010
    Hunter is right because of two very important points:

    This is nothing to do with fairness and honesty, and everything to do with keeping Khan on the money-train.

    There is nothing to investigate without evidence and that video is not evidence. Any serious court would laugh it out the room without corroborating evidence.
     
  12. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    24,013
    16
    Nov 29, 2007
    I thought from day one that 90% of this is PR. Just drive into people's heads that the loss is dubious. All of these accusations and complaints just get the press reporting that the fight is controversial - and that's exactly what they want.

    The amount of mates who have told me about how dodgy Khan's loss was, but haven't even seen the fight is crazy considering how many usually talk boxing with me.
     
  13. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    24,013
    16
    Nov 29, 2007
    Peterson SD12 Khan

    **** off.
     
  14. Coldhearted

    Coldhearted Active Member Full Member

    1,009
    0
    May 17, 2010
    In all honesty I think WBA would back Khan because he is their cash cow so they are watching their own pockets. I wouldn't take what they say too seriously and I would not say that their opinion is 100% right however the WBA opinion on this does make a difference.

    Hence why boxing is "corrupt" in many areas. Money talks.

    I still think Team Peterson should have just given Khan a rematch then I don't think it would come to this.
     
  15. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    spot on

    khans PR man is probably saj.