http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/columnists/mcguigan/2008/09/27/carl-froch-is-just-one-punch-away-from-the-big-time-115875-20756015/ ENJOY.
lol.is ugly,but for me froch aint going to replace calzaghe.ok he is a good boxer but he holds his front hand too low and any good boxer who has done his home work on him will beat him . there talking as froch is a twenty four year old prospect.he is only five years younger than calzaghe. i hope im wrong and he does replace calzaghe at the top of smw but with the likes of kessler and pavlik out there i cant see it.
A couple of points. 1 Why does he assume that to be a star in boxing you have to be good-looking? Anyway, Froch is most definately not. 2 Best super-middleweight in the world? Mikkel Kessler? Lucian Bute? Jermain Taylor? Wake the **** up Barry. 3 He mentions his power, chin and 'awkwardness', which I don't think he has, but certainly not his appalling handspeed, hilariously open defence and lack of basic boxing skills. 4 He talks of impressive displays over Tony Dodson and Robin Reid? Yes, exactly, Tony Dodson and Robin Read. Hardly proves he is the 'best suppermiddleweight in the world'. 5 He clearly doesn't know Pascal if the two best words he can think of to explain him are 'strong' and 'unbeaten'.
Good looking He has a nose like ****ing pinocchio This content is protected Kessler is the best looking, and would probably top a p4p best looking list.
this threads is now embued with slightly homoerotic overtones,his looks mean what exactly? i tend to side with mcguigan on certain aspects ,i think he should know his stuff dont you.
