Dont underestimate the Lewis jab. It was right up there with those of Joe Louis and Sonny Liston in terms of brute force when it detonated. A jab becomes a lot more dangerous as a tool when it has that kind of torque behind it.
More than one oponent of Louis and Liston comented that their jab landed harder than most guys cross. I dont think it is a stretch to suggest that the same could be said of Lewis's jab. We are dealing with the big artilery here.
When Lewis works the jab, it's equal to Liston or Holmes, for sure. I don't doubt that for a second. The thing is is that Lewis sometimes fannies about with it a little bit, doesn't deployt it properly. The Liston/Holmes jab is always on song.
On the inside there would be no contest. Holmes would be too straight up. Walcott and Moore were way, way better inside fighters.
Yeah but size doesn't determine punching power, remember? I think Holmes, Liston, Lewis, and my fav Louis all had great jabs, maybe a rating like this: 1 Liston 1 Holmes 3 Lewis 4 Louis
I don't underestimate it. It is a top 5 heavyweight jab of all time IMO. But Holmes's jab is better at all aspects.
I would assume that Louis, Liston and Lewis were a league above Holmes in the power of their jabs if nothing else. Care to comment?
No. Look at the power in Holmes's jab in the Ocasio, Evangelista, McCall, and both Spinks fights, even the Mercer fight when Larry wasn't counter punching. These pictures are what Holmes's jabs do. This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected
Here is what Lewis's jabs do. This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected