Im not sure who is on the panel, but I don't quite agree with their list. 1. Kell Brook - Welterweight 2. Carl Frampton - Super-bantamweight 3. Amir Khan - Light-welterweight 4. James DeGale - Super-middleweight 5. Scott Quigg - Super-bantamweight 6. Tyson Fury - Heavyweight 7. Lee Selby - Featherweight 8. Jamie McDonnell - Bantamweight 9. Billy Joe Saunders - Middleweight 10. Terry Flanagan - Lightweight I would go for... 1. Tyson Fury - Heavyweight. 2.Kell Brook - Welterweight 3. Carl Frampton - Super-bantamweight 4.James DeGale - Super-middleweight 5. Scott Quigg - Super-bantamweight 6. Amir Khan - Light-welterweight 7. Lee Selby - Featherweight 8. Billy Joe Saunders - Middleweight 9. Jamie McDonnell - Bantamweight 10. Chris Eubank Jr Any thoughts??
**** list How can Khan be above Fury who has just easily beat the world's best heavyweight? 1 - Fury 2 - Degale 3 - Brook 4 - Frampton 5 - Quigg 6 - McDonnell 7 - Billy Joe Saunders 8 - Lee Selby 9 - Terry Flannagan 10 - Eubank Jr
How are Quigg and Frampton above BJS? Eubank JR and Andy Lee are better P4P than anybody on their resumes.
Chris Eubank jnr, get off the hype train and watch all fighters, Flannagan and even Liam Smith are above Eubank jnr.
Lee is ****, mate. He was hyped up because he got a handful of highlight reel KO's against bums. Let's not forget he barely s****ed a jaw and was nearly down and out against Peter Quillin. That isn't the sign of a good fighter and his power is overrated since Quillin has been exposed as been chinny.
Not sure how Eubank is on this list?! Is beating Spike and the second Chudinov enough? He has never held a proper title (WBA interim doesn't count). Its a matter of personal opinion of course.
1 - Fury 2 - Degale 3 - Brook 4 - McDonnell 5 - Billy Joe Saunders 6 - Frampton 7 - Quigg 8 - Lee Selby 9 - Terry Flannagan 10 - lee
Khan weighs in as a welterweight, but because he boxes smaller guys the BBC rate him as a light-welter. :huh