Behold your false god, Roberto Duran

let's take a look at your falser god:

This content is protected

 

d+

 

how do i eeeengleessh?

 

Ripcity is one of the most embarassingly simple-minded posters I've ever come across on any forum.

 

You havent seen the General forum have you ?

 

:huh atsch

 

I don't usually venture over there unless I'm looking to do a bit of trolling myself, so I can't really judge them. Who knows who's being facetious? It is a ride, though, I will say. As long as you don't take it seriously, you can't help but be entertained. A bit like the Wicker Man remake with Nicolas Cage.

 

"Duran was a natural Middleweight"

"Duran was in his prime when he fought Buchanan"



NOBODY CARES YOU KNOWLEDGELESS ****!

 

I'm not even surprised given who started the thread. This is the disingenuous little ***** who routinely goes onto the Lounge to defend Israeli soldiers from putting 8-year-old girls up against the wall and blasting their heads open, claiming that the naughty little suicide bombers deserved what they got. Don't expect any better guys.

How many washed-up 38-year-old Lightweights could have stepped up and slugged it out against a monster Middleweight like Barkley? How would Mayweather have done against Hagler? How many natural MWs could have taken the left hook at 4:10 without being completely iced? And you claim Duran had no toughness? You probably haven't even watched the fights, you're just got your head too far rammed up your idol's arse to see it.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQs-KSD0R_M[/ame]

 

Cool writeup man. Too bad you forgot one of his very best wins :good

 

So that one doesn't count then?

So lopsidedly outpointing an arguable ATG Lightweight counts for nothing? So Saddler's victories over Pep are meaningless because he had to foul his way there?

Peppermint Frazer, Viruet, Ray Lampkin, Ray Lampkin again, Ishimatsu, Medina. Essentially, his record reads like a who's-who of top Lightweight contenders in the mid-late 70s, in a very good (though not great) era for talent. And that's without looking at the film of him which exists, which doubtless you haven't.

So a win for a Lightweight over a recent WW titleist with 10 (?) defences means nothing? Let me ask you this: How would DLH and Mosley got on with Cuevas? How would Cotto and Margarito got on? Mayweather gets wins over them and you'd be singing from the rooftops. Oh - and I guess Hearns gets no credit for that win either?

And so this one doesn't count either? And I guess Mayweather's win over the past-it DLH who lost to every great fighter he faced doesn't count either on that account?

No, but a 38-year-old former Lightweight successfully slugging it out with a boiled-down Light Heavy in his prime and scooping up a fourth title is absolutely a great win. How would Mayweather do with Barkley? How would Pernell Whitaker, Benny L do with him?

So what? A win over a top-rated perennial contender is valueless?

So Mayweather's win over Mosley doesn't count either?

And I see you've ignored Duran's win over Marcel... I guess Marcel was just a bum

Yes, it was absolutely shameful. However, making the leap from that to "Mayweather has more heart than Duran" - the man who has a reputation for avoiding everybody who might pose a threat to his transparent image - is ridiculous. Again, if you'd watched anything real of Duran you'd realise he fought wars across five decades and never backed down.

Despite putting in arguably his most complete performance here?

What a bum

So it doesn't matter that a faded Duran only narrowly lost to arguably the best H2H Middleweight, in his prime (and some think he won the fight)?

Leonard was a WW, Duran a LW.

As I've said before: How would Benny and Pernell fair vs. Hagler?

And again "Duran was a natural Middleweight" :roflatsch

:rofl:rofl:rofl

Go and hang yourself.

 

Leave the ****ing hippie alone. I don't even know why you guys bother. Itry I know you know this.