His argument is all over the place, the scattergun approach is just putting more and more holes in his defence.
I haven't seen the interview I'll catch up on it tomorrow but the general consensus I'm reading on here and Twitter is that it was a car crash? I can't for the life of me think why it would be seen beneficial to go on and get interviewed like that when your story has so many holes in it that it's laughable. Make no mistake, Hearn, Benn etc will all be reading Tiwtter to see how the interview has been received, they must be all out of ideas now as to what to do next. This content is protected For those that have seen it, does this tweet sum it up perfectly?
Piers is repeatedly asking him why aren't you giving the 270 page document to the bbbfoc. Conor and Nigel Benn both came up with a ridiculous set of answers.
Shades of the Prince Andrew denial interview making the public lose any shred of doubt whether he is guilty or not
It's disgusting that Pac Man's health is going to be seriously damaged by this self absorbed drugs cheat. Shame on Hearn if he makes the fight. Putting a true legend's health on the line to get a jumped up drugs cheat a big pay day.
Conor Benn should have hired a spin doctor who would review the possible questions in advance. Then he could have practiced some sensible answers. I didn't get any wiser watching this interview....