Benn fails drug test

yep they’ve gone after the bbboc because smearing them undermines the case against BENNE - in the easily manipulated minds of the vaccinated rabble at least.

Regards,
A. Pureblood ETC.

 

One of Hearn's favourite lines in recent interviews is that the public don't talk about other fighters who have tested positive and there is just an agenda aimed at Benn.

But other fighters who have failed tests have accepted their ban unlike the arrogant, self absorbed tool that is Benn

 

Surprising what a few imported eggs can do

 

If the NADP ruled against Benn I would have no issue with it as they simply rule based on the merits of each case.

What you want is Ukad and the bboc to not only bring the case but also get to decide the outcome of the case all because in this matter you didn't get the decision you wanted.

Same with Robert Smith. His claiming Benn wasn't cleared by the Bboc and UKAD which in theory is correct.

But in reality it makes very little sense. Benn was cleared by the NADP. The most important part of the whole process considering they are the actual ones making the decision.

Robert Smith may not like it, Jordan may not like it, Catterall may not like it but no amount of bitching about it changes that fact. Benn was cleared by the NADP, he doesn't need to be cleared by everyone else.

Let's just flip the ruling and say Benn lost the case however he didn't actually really lose as his appealed the ruling so saying he lost the case isn't actually true and is nothing but lies to try and deceive the public.

Sounds pretty ridiculous doesn't it? It sure would be!!!

 

Hearns junior is a certified bully who when backed into a corner plays the victim card. He’s a busted flush at this point but hasn’t realised it himself yet that most people now see through his character

 

Definitely.

Being the main man with Sky went ho Eddie's head big time. He thought he'd go over to USA and take over completely.
All he has done is **** most other promoters off and no one wants anything to do with him.

His jewel in the crown AJ has become a laughing stock and he now seems to think Benn is going to be the next big superstar.
In reality his backing of Benn, who is nothing special at all, has seen his popularity nose dive massively.

Every time he does a new interview insulting everyone's intelligence and expecting us to swallow his bull**** makes me hate him even more

 

No one denies he has won the NADP case. He has clearly been unsuspended which hqs allowed him to box abroad.

No one knows what the NADP ruled on, but we're led to believe it was jurisdiction and not on the evidence that conor benn alludes to that clears him.

All people want is transparency.

We have a fighter that has failed 2 tests and we still do not know how clomid got into his system.

We have massive safeguarding issues in terms how the board handled the process and the duty of care to Eubank.

We have massive concerns as to what this means for VADA testing in the UK.

It is a crisis shrouded in secrecy. It is highly damaging to the sport.

 

I agree we should get full transparency but the secrecy and confidential details isn't something matchroom brought in.

It's always confidential.

 

It was absolutely devastating wasn't it?

"I don't know the substance of those"
"I don't know anything about what's been said or this documentary"
"I'll watch it, but obviously not good for the board"
"The BBBofC are one of the best commissions in the world"

Hearn said nothing wrong imho, just a bunch of generic platitudes about race and gender equality that somehow took several minutes.

Typical bad form by IFL by playing up some pretty generic comments into something they aren't. Also he was straight-faced when he made the "could end the board" comment.

FWIW, both the John-Lewis and Hinds stories have been public since at least January.

 

Why did Benn fail the two tests? Where is that 270 page dossier to clear his name?

 

Normally after NADP hearings there is a judgement that is posted on sports resolution website detailing how NADP reached their conclusion. That hasn't happened on this instance, which is odd.

 

Hearn has probably threatened to sue them if they did

 

I think that was due to waiting to see if the appeal would be lodged first inside the 21 days.

 

You seem to know a lot of stuff about Benn, Hearn, Matchroom, rulings ect.

Don't suppose you could tell us the grounds that Benn actually got 'cleared' on?

Strange how you spend many thousands on proving your innocence then hide the outcome that shows you were innocent all along

 

Just Google search stuff and try to work with what I find.

I wish I knew the reasons Benn got cleared. The narrative being pushed about jurisdiction with no actual evidence given to prove it was jurisdiction is laughable.

On the one hand Jordan, Catterall etc are claiming Benn wasn't cleared, don't believe what Hearn says as factually Benn wasn't cleared.

Yet on the other hand they are presenting jurisdiction as the reason for Benn being cleared as a fact but they do not for sure. Not once do you hear them say 'it was likely jurisdiction or it could have been jurisdiction'. It's just 100% jurisdiction even though the hearing was behind closed doors and all parties are bound to confidentiality.