Benny Leonard as the greatest lightweight of all time: still true?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Rollin, Jan 8, 2022.


  1. louis54

    louis54 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,187
    1,300
    Mar 20, 2013
    Parcel picked leonard over duran. Id say gans was one percent better or maybe more. Gans went forty rounds, could in fight very well and knock your brains out from one to thirty rounds
     
    Samtotheg likes this.
  2. Jpreisser

    Jpreisser Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,827
    1,387
    Jan 29, 2015
    Of course you could still argue that Leonard rates above Duran. Duran usually seems to come out ahead for some because they believe he was the better fighter, which is fair. He did have greater multi-weight success. However when you stick strictly to credentials at lightweight, Leonard has a far better resume. He fought many more Hall of Famers and contenders. Also, people love to bring up Duran's mark of 72-1 before losing to Leonard in the rematch, but if you look at Leonard's run after his newspaper decision loss to Dundee in 1916, he went 94-2-1 before retiring in 1924. None of the losses, nor the draw, came at lightweight.
     
    Last edited: Jan 10, 2022
  3. Greb & Papke 707

    Greb & Papke 707 Active Member Full Member

    649
    639
    Apr 9, 2019
    Benny Gans or Duran, I wouldn’t argue with any of them as top dog of lightweight
     
    louis54, Fogger and Jel like this.
  4. Moonlight

    Moonlight Walking in the moonlight... lonely.. as always.. Full Member

    616
    497
    Nov 12, 2021
    Leonard > Gans > Duran
     
    PhillyPhan69 likes this.
  5. Fogger

    Fogger Father, grandfather and big sports fan. Full Member

    7,897
    12,540
    Aug 9, 2021
    This top three is about as good as the top three in any division. Welterweight is probably a bit better but that's about it.
     
  6. red corner

    red corner Active Member banned Full Member

    1,484
    952
    Oct 9, 2021
  7. Samtotheg

    Samtotheg Active Member Full Member

    822
    393
    May 4, 2021
    Jeremiah presser I first read your thoughts on Durans resume on facebook,always knew what you were talking about then and If I had to cast aside popular myths and do research (I ended up doing that) durans resume doesnt compete with Leonards at lightweight (how many hall of famers did Leonard defeat multiple times in that run compared to Durans run.
     
    Jpreisser likes this.
  8. LoadedGlove

    LoadedGlove Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,527
    4,279
    Dec 6, 2019
    If you read Donald K Fried's " Corner Men ", you'll learn that Arcel worked with Benny from his very earliest days. Right back to the move from Krupp's to Stillman's gyms.
    In many ways, Leonard taught Arcel.
    You're absolutely right in that Ray was in charge in the corner in Leonard's comeback.
     
    louis54 likes this.
  9. LoadedGlove

    LoadedGlove Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,527
    4,279
    Dec 6, 2019
    Manny Seamon. Great to see him name checked. Wonderful trainer.
     
    louis54 likes this.
  10. Tonto62

    Tonto62 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    5,040
    4,968
    Mar 26, 2011
    Arcel was 17 years old when Leonard ko'd Freddie Welsh to win the title.Doc Robb was Leonard' s head trainer in his lightweight career.Mannie Seamon was his assistant ,coming on board at the age of 20 and working with then Champion Leonard for 8 years.
    When Leonard turned pro in1912 ,Arcel was11 years old.
    This is from a compilation book called," The Hurt Business" highly recommended.
    Ray Arcel and Freddie Brown are talking with Leonard Gardner in all night restaurant after Duran had just beaten Ray Leonard.".Arcel was asked if Duran was the greatest fighter he had ever trained.For awhile he didn't answer ,as if unwilling his devotion to the legendary Benny Leonard,whom he considered the greatest lightweight he had ever seen.But then the past seemed to give up its hold on him.He was tired,and he told me Leonard was all used up by the time he had worked with him.At last ,[in answer to the question,] Arcel said ,""Yes,and a moment later added Duran is the best fighter in the world . "
     
    Last edited: Jan 10, 2022
    louis54 and LoadedGlove like this.
  11. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,087
    Oct 28, 2017
    I think there's just a few too many question marks around Gans for me to be entirely comfortable putting him at the top.

    The Britt fight is the big one, I don't find the stories of it being fixed convincing at all, and while Gans did win, he was getting massacred before the DQ.

    I think the McGovern loss was probably a fix, but there's enough doubt to also make me uncomfortable.

    I do think beating Welsh is a better win than any Gans has too.
     
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,888
    45,672
    Mar 21, 2007
    The Britt fight is something, but the problem is that Gans was brutalised by weight-making. He looked nothing like he did in this fight in the second one - and he was victorious in both. Gans was in very bad trouble at the time of the stoppage - but he was a ring genius who never got the chance to prove it because Britt repeatedly struck him when he was down and then attacked the reeree.

    Jimmy Britt absolutely did not beat Joe Gans, though in his first loss, he did hurt him. So I can't see that it matters tbh.
     
  13. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,087
    Oct 28, 2017
    If we're going to blame Gans' losses on brutal weight making, does that also not raise the question of him also having an unfair size advantage over many opponents when he managed to make weight successfully?

    I think it's probably fair to say Britt had gone backwards for their second too. I don't know if he lost focus, or if his amateur career had left him a lot more shopworn than his pro career suggests. Before the rematch Britt was knocked out by Nelson, and probably got the worse of a fight with a completely out of shape Terry McGovern. Plus Britt also injured his wrist.

    The DQ was absolutely the only call that could be made, but Britt was all over Gans, he was not coming back into the fight. Gans was being battered around the ring in the third, In the 4th round Gans was knocked down, then went down twice more (either being shoved down or choosing to go down to avoid punishment). Britt accused Gans of going down to avoid punishment, and one of the next day reports implies Gans was intentionally trying to get hit while down to avoid punishment.

    I think the fight is a bit like Bowe Golota.
     
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,888
    45,672
    Mar 21, 2007
    Well Gans made weight the same day, even as champion, often at behest of his opponent when he was white. But yeah, if you like, I wouldn't get upset about it. I don't think it really matters though. He staged more defences than any lightweight in history, against very good competition, during what i'm happy to call the deepest lightweight division in history - and for all that Leonard has a single better win, Gans beat more guys in my top fifty and more highly all-time rated guys overall. Leonard has a lot of defences, I think 11 off the top of my head, but he repeatedly defended against guys he'd already proved his superiority over - for example Rocky Kansas, who I think he defended against three times though he totally thrashed him the first time.

    Most of all, Gans return to the title ring after a terrible loss to Erne and involving himself in a fixed fight is the greatest comeback in all of sports to me. Newspapers openly called Gans a yellow cheat and he was as firmly in the wilderness as any black fighter has ever been, only years after emancipation. What he did was as extraordinary as anything that has occurred in the ring IMO. It shouldn't really have been possible. Only absolute domination and irresistible brilliance made it possible.

    Overall, Gans had the more impressive run for me, though Leonard is my number two, so I don't feel like it's a disaster to have Leonard ahead of him - I see it to Gans clear though.

    Maybe - he did lose the first fight though, so I can't really see it matters all that much even if it is true. The breakdown, basically, is that Gans made a weight at ringside that he couldn't meet and fight to a proper standard. Britt dominated, but lost. Then they rematched with Gans in better nick and Britt having gone back a bit. Britt hur himself and lost the second fight.

    And that is the tale of Gans and Britt. I don't think it reflects that badly on Gans tbh.

    He was in a very bad way, no two ways about it - but he was also one of the greatest fighters ever to have drawn a breath. You can't hand a win out over him like a sweet.

    :lol:
     
  15. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,087
    Oct 28, 2017
    In general, no, but I think it does at this level.


    It was basicaly the unanimous opinion of those that saw the fight, that Gans was on the way out.

    He was certainly in a far far worse state than Corbett was against Sharkey, for example.