Bermane Stiverne vs. Deontay Wilder speculation & discussion

Malik Scott was top 50 when he 'beat' him, and has bounced back inside top 50 again after decisioning Leapai, but I don't trust that fight so Wilder has beaten nobody top 50. Part of it is Wilder is ducked by some but he could have faced another fighter also ducked, a live contender, something like Perez vs Magomed, two guys nobody wanted to fight. Andy Ruiz Jnr springs to mind, no chance though.

 

This fight ain't happening. Besides, it needs to be built up into a much bigger event. I'd say sometime in mid to late 2016 should be fine.

 

Mid-January is the expectation. No date or site announced but WBC has said that the sides have reached agreement.

 

Stiverne should be stripped of the title and it should be handed to Wilder! Stiverne is embarr***ing the way he is being a chicken boy and avoiding deontay at all costs.

 

:nod

 

Yeah, the title should be handed to Wilder without his earning it. atsch


Wilder fanboys are pathetic.

 

We can see through your hidden racist agenda. :nono

 

WBC covering their *** with That statement. It's bs a purse bid was ordered in first week of October you don't get two additional months to hammer out deal with no details made available. Force a purse bid already.

 

Pot calling the kettle black.

What's racist about my saying that Wilder should have to earn the title without it being handed to him?

 

If it was a EE fighter or anyone non American, your tone would be quite different. :rofl

We both know you dislike any American fighter or any fighter that does not come out of Eastern Europe!! :deal

Fact is: If Stiverne does not fight Wilder (Keeps running away), then Wilder should be the beneficiary of said title!!

 

I am American atsch

If Stiverne decides to sit on his *** and not fight then his title definitely needs to be vacated, and 2 men should fight for it, it shouldn't be handed to anyone. You know damn well that any half decent HW knows windmill spark out, of course think he should receive it without having to fight for it. If Stiverne is stripped then Wlad, and Wilder should fight for it :good

 

No one should be stripped. A purse bid should be ordered.

 

Somehow, I highly doubt this from how you speak on a regular basis. Your undying hate for American fighters speak volumes. I could be wrong, but I seriously doubt it.

And no, almost all if not ALL the HW's out there get sparked by Wilder easily. Do you not see that man's insane power?

That power is enough to kill a man. His good wins are undermined and ridiculed because of his nationality imo. I've made a thread on this before.

This is a different scenario altogether

Wilder is the clear #1 WBC contender and Stiverne is wasting everyone's time by not signing. If he does not sign, then Wilder should simply be awarded the title. Wilder should not have to keep waiting and waiting and waiting for the title to be around his waist.

What if Wlad does the same ****? Or someone else?!

Wilder has separated himself from the pack already.

 

Wilder is the #1 challenger.....but he is not the interim champion. So nothing should be handed to him. Stiverne needs to be stripped if he doesn't sign and get in the ring, and Wilder and the next available contender fight for the VACANT belt.

 

Stiverne was the first to sign the contract and its old school style training first in the gym last to leave. Then its road work through the desert.