Bernard Hopkins? ATG? Debateable!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Arran, Jan 12, 2009.


  1. crosseyed

    crosseyed Active Member Full Member

    672
    2
    Mar 27, 2005
    Well, Sues post appropriately put a timeline on what I was trying to say. I think the problem here is that you have somehow transported the Hopkins of today who can pick his opponents and is a big name and very experienced with the Hopkins of 1991-1996, who was an ex-con with zero fan base fighting his way up the ranks and not nearly as accomplished. You're right, he was stuck fighting guys like Gilbert Baptist at the Blue Horizon, you think he's going to pick up the phone, call Michael ****ing Nunn and get that fight! It's not a serious position.

    It's the equivalent of say, in fifteen years if somebody like Juan Manuel Lopez goes on to have a great career, saying that he ducked Pac, Marquez, Morales, Barrera and Hamed! It makes no sense.

    Hopkins during his prime years, and even today, is not a huge draw, and it was only after the Trinidad fight that he got real leverage. Since that point nobody can argue that he has fought a murderer's row.

    I agree it's unfortunate that he never got to fight the guys you listed, but I would have loved to see Hagler-Monzon and Napoles-Leonard fight too.

    List some guys from 96-2001 who Hopkins should have fought. A time when at least he had a belt and some leverage. Otherwise you're just being silly.
     
  2. Arran

    Arran Boxing Junkie banned

    9,773
    3
    Jan 21, 2008
    so what you are saying is Hopkins refused to fight anyone worth his salt in a division above but anyone with a name from down to 4 divisions below?
     
  3. Zakman

    Zakman ESB's Chinchecker Full Member

    31,866
    3,117
    Apr 16, 2005
    This seems to be the most sensible statement I've seen.

    Both Hopkins and Calzaghe are ATGs.
     
  4. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Log out. Cancel membership. Re-think life.
     
  5. King Dan

    King Dan Golovkin Full Member

    3,589
    1
    Feb 24, 2005
    Co-sign.
     
  6. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Sweet sweet ownage :good
     
  7. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    yeah and pacman fights dlh 3 different weight divisions away.... jones jumps to heavy, adamek goes to cruiser .... leonard met lalonde at a catch weight. point being, dont say because they went up to super middle, that was the end all. fights COULD HAVE BEEN MADE. youre a true nut sucker for making an exuse for EVERY guy on that list.......
    point is, we are talking about an 8 pound difference. so i guess theres no way any fight could have been made after a guy goes up 8 pounds.
    and all the guys they had last fight at 160 in 92, 93, 94....you made my point.....thats a 3 year window dumb ass to make a fight......:patsch:patsch
     
  8. sues2nd

    sues2nd Fading into Bolivian... Full Member

    9,760
    8
    Aug 7, 2004
    :patsch

    So you are saying that Hopkins should have fought those guys before he had a title in 94 and earlier? Really? Or you are saying that he should have either...moved up and given up on his quest of consecutive defenses to fight fighters out of their primes or begged a few of those fighters out of retirement? Or what about Gman?

    Face it...you mentioned a couple of good - great MWs, hoping noone would check up to see if you had any clue what you are talking about. I mean, it was YOU who said that he never made a fight with any of these "great MWs" during his reign.

    Just stop posting...:lol:
     
  9. dave82

    dave82 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,570
    0
    Mar 5, 2006
    If you log out now I will send you flowers as 'thank you'. You do like Pancies right?
     
  10. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    This isn't even laughable. Just pathetic.