Bernard Hopkins: I'd Rather Have Manny Pacquiao's Legacy Than Floyd Mayweather's.

again...WTF was the obligation to fight someone like Raheem? Who was in a different weight class BTW.

 

Different weight class? Didn't Pacquiao beat bum Diaz at 135? The point is fight the winner of Morales vs Raheem and prove you can compete with all styles.

 

Are you stupid? Yes he beat Diaz...in 2008 when he moved up there. Morales fought raheem in 2005. Do some freakin research before you infect this board with your garbage.

No, the point is NOT to defeat as many styles as you can. Who the eff ever said that?

 

Picked the easiest target to get a belt at 168... And lets not forget about the great Liam Smith, who he went to a title grab at 154 AFTER fighting Khan at 160

 

The irony hahahajaja

A Pacquiao fanatic talking about another fighter ducking random testing...

 

Why didn't Pacquiao fight David Diaz for the LW title? Why did he fight Margarito for the JrMW title?

 

Just like Pac did with Diaz and Margarito hahahah

 

You're full of irony today aren't you? The biggest attention seeker calling someone beta? LMAO!!

What question son?

 

You are the one that seems to be stupid , Morales vs Raheem happened before Pacquiao vs Morales 2, Pacquiao still went after Morales after being embarrassed by Raheem , reason Morales went to 135 was because he couldn't make 130 anymore, So why fight the loser and someone who can't make 130 anymore instead of going against the winner?

 

I know when it happened idiot. That was due to Morale's attempt for a fourth division title. He lost to raheem, went back down to 130. Do you think you're telling me something I don't know, or that you are discovering something? No it wasn't about weight you freaking liar. You just make **** up because you're too stupid and lazy to research first...

Morales was soft in the middle versus raheem. Use your empty head and guess what that suggests.

And read this FFS... https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2005-sep-11-sp-boxing11-story.html