Bernard Hopkins is proof Mayweather is overrated defensively

:rofl ...god damn people are reaching.

What about the fights where Hopkins fights like a ****ing homo? :rofl ,

2009: "Floyd would never fight the top welterweight!"
2010: "Floyd only fought him b/c he was old!"

:rofl ...****ing kids.

 

Good luck with this arguement.

 

You know would "proof" means, right?

 

I ain't even going to bother ready this ****. I don't like either of them but they are both defensive masters.

 

It was not like Hopkins was never hit: DLH hit him , Taylor hit him, etc.
I disagree Mayweather's defense is overrated. It's great. However if you compare it to Hopkins' I think the latter one's D if better though.

 

Hopkins is brilliant defensively.. but dont forget Floyd was a little guy not too long ago..

 

That's not proof that's a thesis lol. Plus Bernard is dirty head buts, low blows you name em

 

intersting points. Bernard is a great defensive fighter though. People underrate him. No shame in being under Hopkins. The dude is one of the most sound technical boxers ever, even though he fought way under his potential throughout a lot of his career. His domination of Trinidad was boxing 101.

 

What you showed in this thread is that Hopkins has a great defense and has taken little punishment over the years...NOT that Mayweather's defense is overrated. If you believe Mayweather's defense is overrated, I suggest you watch a little more boxing...because after all, no-one can dodge, slip, or block every punch right?

 

So Mayweather is hurt by the biggest puncher in the division and all of a sudden he's got a leaky defence?

You do know that Floyd kicked his arse from then on?

 

And how much bigger was Hopkins than most of these opponents you mentioned? Trindida and DHL did their best work at 135 - 147. Pavlik was outweighed on fightnight by ten pounds. RJJ fought him with a broken hand. Hopkins was hurt by Calzaghe's pace to go to the wrong corner four times and cheat like crazy to get breathers.

Mayweather fights clean, fighters of his own size. I admire Hopkins, but this is a stupid argument.

 

If there is a huge gaping hole in Floyd's defense for about 2 seconds then the average boxer's hole lasts for 5 seconds. Floyd has been stunned several times in his career but he has never been beaten even once whereas Hopkins has tasted a loss 5 times. You lose more points when you suffer a loss as opposed to getting caught by a hurtful shot. Granted Hop has fought more difficult opponents than Floyd has however Floyd is a better offensive fighter than Hop, and part of a great defense is a great offense. I think we'll get an even more clear indication of where Floyd stands historically if he shuts down Pacquiao because it would mean he conquered the ultimate offensive machine. At that point calling him the greatest defensive fighter of all time would not be outrageous.

 

Difference between Floyd and Bernard?
Bernard fought the best welterweights ^^