Bernard Hopkins is proof Mayweather is overrated defensively

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Exactabox, Jun 24, 2010.


  1. Wig

    Wig Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,779
    4,218
    May 31, 2010
    Dude if you are going to leave out Marquez from Floyd, to ensure a balanced view you'd need to leave out

    Pavlik
    Delahoya
    Trinidad

    from Hopkins.

    D-
     
  2. dannyboy147

    dannyboy147 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,814
    1,410
    Jun 2, 2010
    you my friend are a waste of skin!
     
  3. Wig

    Wig Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,779
    4,218
    May 31, 2010
    if you don't agree perhaps explain why?
    :verysad
     
  4. Sting

    Sting Akagami no Shanks Full Member

    2,998
    0
    Jan 19, 2008
    Always considered Hopkins as the better defensive fighter than Floyd.

    Oh and Winky too.
     
  5. Mrtibbs

    Mrtibbs Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,800
    78
    Aug 5, 2009
    Are you honestly trying to say his defence is overated. Can you please tell me who in the last 25 years has better D than him....

    Answer: Very few people!

    You my friend are a ****.
     
  6. abujafar

    abujafar Active Member Full Member

    1,070
    0
    Feb 7, 2009

    This:rofl
     
  7. abujafar

    abujafar Active Member Full Member

    1,070
    0
    Feb 7, 2009
    This too. Many of Bernard's best wins were against smaller fighters.
    It behooves me why he doesn't get criticized for it.
     
  8. oibighead

    oibighead G.O.A.T. Full Member

    12,724
    4
    Jan 1, 2010
    :deal

    exactly
     
  9. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Hopkins has been hurt numerous times in his career
     
  10. BewareofDawg

    BewareofDawg P4P Champ Full Member

    27,677
    184
    Apr 8, 2006
    Dude, what the **** is wrong with people?????
    :patsch Floyd is better than Hops defensively, it's close but he is. He can do anything Hop can, but better. Floyd's resume is better than BHop, Floyd is greater than BHop.

    That fact that you called Tito "at his peak" shows how impartial you are. Hopkins is the most overrated fighter on this forum and his resume is easier to destroy than anyone elses.
    Jones in his prime broke Hopkins's defense
    Calzaghe broke Hopkins defense
    Tito and Hoya fought well above their prime weight
    Pavlik and Wright fought above their prime weight
    Taylor beat him twice :lol: and then got destroyed by Pavlik/Froch/Abraham.....why couldnt Hopkins beat this guy????
     
  11. mattress

    mattress Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,030
    2
    Apr 8, 2007
    :lol::lol:great post!:thumbsup
     
  12. globenerd

    globenerd Guest

    I agree the topic of this thread is dumb, but to say Mosley was the top welterweight is a joke.
     
  13. globenerd

    globenerd Guest

    His only real loss was against a bigger fighter. Jones was naturally a much bigger man. That's why he was fighting at light heavy just a couple years later.
     
  14. BewareofDawg

    BewareofDawg P4P Champ Full Member

    27,677
    184
    Apr 8, 2006
    What makes it a joke? That Max Kellerman and the entire HBO broadcast team said he was the top threat behind Pac to Floyd. Is it that he DESTROYED margo, who WAS the top welter? What makes it a joke? Who was the top welter then? Pac, he had fought Oscar at WW, then Cotto BELOW WW and then Clottey. How does he have more of a claim than Shane did at that time???
     
  15. BewareofDawg

    BewareofDawg P4P Champ Full Member

    27,677
    184
    Apr 8, 2006
    Jones IS NOT a naturally bigger man than Hopkins. This is Obvious by looking at the two in their rematch. You do know Hopkins started at Lt Heavy right? And he admits himself that he is a natural Lt Heavy, and he ONLY fought at Middle because he felt there was more prestige and money, this isn't debatable, it comes from Hopkins himself. :deal