Bernard Hopkins is the best boxer of the 21st century. Not Mayweather/Pacquiao

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by I Know Everythi, Jun 23, 2014.


  1. I Know Everythi

    I Know Everythi Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,100
    25
    Feb 12, 2014
    If Roy Jones didn't drain himself post-Ruiz, he'd be the best of the 2000s, but it's Hopkins

    Bernard Hopkins

    1) prime Trinidad who established himself at middleweight against Joppy, so no size excuse
    2) KOd De La Hoya and only weighed one more pound at weigh ins - so no size excuse. De La Hoya was not as washed up as when he fought Pac and Floyd
    3) lost to Taylor twice - two close decisions that could go either way, at age 40
    4) jumped up 2 classes immediately to fight Tarver, shut him out
    5) beat Winky Wright right after he was robbed of the 160 title - better than any win on Floyd or Pac's record
    6) robbed against Calzaghe, at age 42
    7) crushed Pavlik
    8. beat Pascal (plus robbery) . better than 90% of Pac/Floyd's wins seeing as Pascal beat Chad Dawson
    9) lost to Chad Dawson

    only guy to CLEARLY beat Hopkins was Chad Dawson - at age 46.

    Manny Pacquiao

    1) Bradley - not better than Trinidad/Oscar/Winky wins
    2) Marquez - about as good as Trinidad/Oscar wins, but Pacquiao needed 3 controversial decisions and got KOd by him, whereas Hopkins won way more convincingly. Not better than Winky win
    3) Morales - coming off a loss to Zahir Raheem, and lost to bum David Diaz immediately after. Solid win but not on Bernard's level
    4) Barrera - good win. Not better than Oscar/Trinidad/Winky
    5) Cotto - good win but he was beaten down from Plasterito. not better than Tito/Winky/Oscar wins
    6) in his prime lost to Morales. Lost to Marquez at least twice.

    Here's the rest of his wins
    1) paper champions - Sasakul, Ledwaba, Velazquez, Diaz, Hatton, Rios
    2) fighters with ZERO wins over elite boxers - Hatton, Clottey
    3) washed up fighters past their best - Cotto, Oscar, Mosley, Margarito

    Floyd Mayweather

    1) Genaro Hernandez – Zero wins over elite fighters in their prime.
    2) Diego Corrales – Did not fight one elite fighter in his prime outside of Mayweather. Someone who gets dominated by Clottey and Casamayor is not elite. To those people who think Corrales is great for being on the p4p rankings, do you also agree that Corrales is better than Hopkins and Lennox for beating bums like Juuko and Manfredy? Because thats what the p4p rankings said too. and p4p rankings have Golovkin in the top 10 for beating Matthew Macklin, and some even had Adrien Broner in the top 10 before the Maidana fight. so try to use some common sense. Not even better than the Pascal, Dawson, Pavlik, or Taylor. Not even Glen Johnson for that matter
    3) Jose Luis Castillo – actually beat Floyd in the first fight. Definitely not a Dawson/Calzaghe/Taylor/Pavlik level fighter. Castillo NEVER fought any elite fighters outside of mayweather.
    4) Arturo Gatti – specifically referred to as a C-class boxer by Mayweather. No elite wins
    5) Zab Judah – lost in literally every meaningful fight he ever had. Far from impressive.
    6) Carlos Baldomir – zero wins over elite boxers
    7) Oscar De La Hoya – Bernard beat a better version of Oscar, and more convincingly.
    8. Ricky Hatton – best wins are Kosta Tzyu (did nothing outside of beat Zab Judah), a shot Castillo, and garbage Malignaggi. Not better than Pascal who actually beat an elite fighter in Dawson.
    9) Marquez – good win. Diminished due to Marquez coming up 2 classes, whereas Hopkins moved up 2 classes himself to fight Tarver, beating him in similar fashion to Mayweather and Marquez.
    10) Shane Mosley – almost 40 years old, washed up. He went 1-3-1 after the Mayweather fight, proving how past his prime he was.
    11) Miguel Cotto – past his prime after his loss to Antonio Margarito, but a good win nonetheless. about as good as Pascal win because of Cotto's regression.
    12) Canelo Alvarez – zero wins over elite boxers. Trout is not elite. Definitely not as good a win as jumping 2 classes to dominate Tarver.
    13) Marcos Maidana – zero wins over elite boxers. Roger Mayweather himself has confirmed this

    Floyd ranks higher than Manny slightly, because he beat a better version of Oscar and he beat Marquez convincingly. Pac's competition is better overall but his losses to Morales and controversial Marquez decisions plus KO6 aren't enough to surpass Floyd. If Pac only had one or two losses/controversial decisions (not counting pre-2000) then perhaps he'd be better than Floyd. But they are not close to Hopkins.

    5 or 8 division champion means nothing if you fight Floyd/Manny competition. If you're the guy who thinks all of Manny and Floyd's meaningless belts and titles make you the greatest fighter, then neither Floyd or Manny come close to Hopkins 20 defenses. Lose-lose situation either way
     
  2. Don't Sleep

    Don't Sleep Personal Trainer Full Member

    3,403
    4
    Jun 16, 2009
    I agree
     
  3. Piece

    Piece Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,476
    7
    May 3, 2014
    I don't think Bernard is as physically gifted as Mayweather or Pacquaio, yet he has more overall skills.

    I agree.

    He's boxing's Huo Yuanjia.
     
  4. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    The OP credits Hopkins for moving up for Tarver, then uses Marquez moving up to diminish Floyd...... yet ignores that Winky, Pavlik, and Calzaghe all moved up in weight for Hopkins.
     
  5. progamer

    progamer Boxing Junkie banned

    10,232
    0
    Nov 25, 2013
    he got overshadowed by jones, the star of his era.

    he got beat by joecal rather easy as well, so much so, he rather wanted to win an oscar than the match.
     
  6. des3995

    des3995 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,903
    126
    Oct 23, 2009
    Disagree. Although I marvel at what he is doing at his age, he is still only beating guys of a certain level in the past decade. Fought a bunch of guys from much lower weights(DLH, Winky, Pavlik etc). Not holding it against him, but it is what it is. I'm not trying to diminish what he's done or is doing, but it hardly ranks him as the best boxer of the 21st century thus far, at least in my book.

    I do think it is fair to say that the things he is doing at this stage of his career are the most challenging of any fighter of the 21st century. It's amazing really, at his age.
     
  7. JamesG1986

    JamesG1986 Active Member Full Member

    730
    1
    May 12, 2013
    Completely agree. I'm a HUGE B hop fan and don't think he's given his due credit not just for this late career run he's been on but his entire career has been great. Fights anybody a couple CLOSE somewhat controversial losses (ahem, jermaine) master boxer, I personally would put him just ahead of floyd and manny
     
  8. Clearly Cool

    Clearly Cool Active Member Full Member

    1,210
    2
    Jan 8, 2007
    Yeah, Bhop deserves mass respect. His recent fights overshaddow a pretty brilliant string of defenses in his earlier days.

    The way he evolved his skills allowed him to keep fighting despite his age, a feat that is both impressive and difficult.

    Even when he loses is it usually by a razor decision or robbery.
    Say what you want about Mayweather....he is controversial for good and bad...but Bhop is actually a better boxer.
     
  9. JamesG1986

    JamesG1986 Active Member Full Member

    730
    1
    May 12, 2013
    I think pac and floyd are more universally acknowledged because the money they bring in while bernard fights don't do as much business but in that ring the man is and always was amazing better technically than manny and possibly floyd
     
  10. markclow

    markclow Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,368
    325
    Aug 23, 2005
    Yeah not bad except for the fact that Calzaghe beat Hopkins fair and square. No shame in that.
     
  11. Impulse_0

    Impulse_0 Active Member Full Member

    1,491
    641
    Oct 22, 2011
    Can we stop underrating the Cotto wins for both Mayweather and Pacquiao.

    Everyone always qualifies the Cotto wins as if the guy was shot or something.

    The man moved up in weight and won the lineal title at middleweight a few weeks ago for gods sake.

    I stopped reading after that. Your list is way to biased... you undermine everything Pac and May have done and embellish Hopkins.
     
  12. VG_Addict

    VG_Addict Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,727
    3,935
    Jun 13, 2012
    What if Hopkins won a title at SMW? How would that add to his legacy?
     
  13. shanahan14

    shanahan14 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,488
    731
    Jul 5, 2011
    This **** again? Calzaghe W12 Hopkins and it was not a robbery. Hopkins was out thrown by over 200 and outlanded by over 100 I believe. Select media had it 114-113 Hopkins, just about ever expert had it for Calzaghe by a wider margin.

    I really can't believe people still call this a robbery.
     
  14. I Know Everythi

    I Know Everythi Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,100
    25
    Feb 12, 2014
    compubox is meaningless.

    Hopkins - effective countering. Calzaghe - meaningless work rate

    Floyd only landed 9 more punches than Maidana but that was a clear victory for him. compubox is for people who have no common sense
     
  15. I Know Everythi

    I Know Everythi Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,100
    25
    Feb 12, 2014
    They did not move up 2 classes while Bernard missed weight to gain an extra advantage.