This is an extract of Beyond The Glory covering Bernard Hopkins. You don't have to like his style, you can say he beat up on smaller men throughout his career, but he deserves credit from picking himself up out of prison to where he is now. Respect. http://youtube.com/watch?v=qez12iiSWy4&feature=related
His resume is grossly overrated, his style is horrible recently compared to his earlier days, he is a total cheating twat, but that is the one thing I admire about him.
Hopkins has alot of high risk / low reward fights on his resume. The type of fighters that cause upsets. He doesn't get enough credit for these wins. Its not easy to have all 4 belts and keep them. Not many fighters could
I'm not even a fan of Bernard Hopkins. Never particuarly enjoyed his style, thought he was thoroughly beaten by Calzaghe, but the man deserves credit. A great champion, and he came from the gutter.
because there are people who feel that Sugar Ray Robinson and Muhammed Ali are grossly overrated, should they also be exempt for that reason?
Those people who's only objective is to discredit real great fighters are the same people who don't matter. The point of this thread wasn't neccesarily to debate whether or not Bernard Hopkins is as good as his resume suggest, but to credit the man for achieving what very little people do. He was reformed in a big way.
i admire him but he was the highest paid most really boring boxer of alltime though to still be a force in the boxing in your early 40's takes some doing. he deserves to be called a great
Hopkins legacy is that he's the most dominant champion in the history of one of boxing's greatest divisions, he's the only man to knockout Trinidad, the only man to knockout De La Hoya, the only man to knockout Glen Johnson, one of only two undisputed Middleweight champions ever to capture the Lightheavyweight crown, the oldest Middleweight champion ever, the oldest man to win the Lightheavyweight belt, the only man to be the WBA/WBC/IBF/WBO/RING champion at the same time, and to defend those belts simultaneously in a single fight. That's a great legacy, whether he became boring in his late 30's and on doesn't matter, it's the legacy of an ATG. And to say he just beat up on smaller men, look at the best wins of Hagler and Monzon: Hagler: Duran (lightweight), Hearns (welterweight), Mugabi (Jr. Middleweight). Monzon: Griffith (Welter), Napoles (Welter), and Benvenuti (Jr. Middle). I'm not saying he's greater than either one, but he's right there with both of them.