Bernard Hopkins vs Charley Burley

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Theron, Jan 30, 2013.


  1. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,678
    183
    May 16, 2009
    I hope you weren't driving near a school
     
  2. UP93

    UP93 Active Member Full Member

    934
    0
    Jul 19, 2012
    :lol:
     
  3. Manassa

    Manassa - banned

    7,766
    93
    Apr 6, 2007
    Hopkins for me. Not quite a fair one, like Tiger versus Basilio (one fighter a bit bigger than the other).
     
  4. Garrus

    Garrus Big Boss 1935-2014 Full Member

    4,909
    67
    Aug 27, 2010
    :rofl:rofl
     
  5. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    400
    Jan 22, 2010
    Touche'...
     
  6. Manassa

    Manassa - banned

    7,766
    93
    Apr 6, 2007
    I think Burley's overrated anyway.

    Yes! A great fighter. But I see people rate him in above Joe Gans and Packey McFarland. Clearly not reasonable. A little lower please #40 or so.
     
  7. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,678
    183
    May 16, 2009
    Burley for me by decision . Hopkins size should not really come into it as burley fought ligh-heavyweights and heavyweights
     
  8. Manassa

    Manassa - banned

    7,766
    93
    Apr 6, 2007
    Good one :lol:
     
  9. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,678
    183
    May 16, 2009
    Ok one heavyweight:D
     
  10. Woller

    Woller Active Member Full Member

    1,372
    315
    Nov 24, 2005
    I have never been fond of Hopkins, but I think he would beat Burley easily on points.

    Woller
     
  11. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,144
    13,101
    Jan 4, 2008
    Jesus, will this Burley wank-fest never end?
     
  12. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    Agree 100% (see him in way too many top 20s) but as Burley proved he could hang with bigger guys he's a live dog here.
     
  13. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,678
    183
    May 16, 2009
    Flea thing that makes me laugh is people like arcel and Futch rank burley extremely highly and remember they saw him . But it seems their opinions are not valid as there is no real film of him:shock: . But other fighters that their is no real film of are total monsters sorry but I will take what is said by arcel and futch as pretty good advice when rating a fighter he was not greb but he was an amazing fighter and would beat Hopkins
     
  14. Surf-Bat

    Surf-Bat Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,736
    97
    Jul 20, 2010
    Funny, but the only advantage people seem to be able to come up with for Hopkins here is size. How much bigger do you feel that a prime BHop was? And why do you think it would matter to Burley considering he beat a 5 lbs heavier Aaron "Tiger" Wade, thrashed a 6 lbs heavier Archie Moore, beat a 7 lbs heavier Jack Chase and an 8 and a half lbs heavier Shorty Hogue?

    That's three Murderer's Row members and one rugged white fighter.

    Hopkins has no advantages here. Or perhaps you feel he has something on Archie Moore?
     
  15. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    400
    Jan 22, 2010
    So true S. i don't understand why Hopkins who would be under 160 pounds
    against Burley in their MW, match would be "much bigger' than Burley if they both weighed in the day of the fight...? Burley,as you described fought often bigger men with great results...