Bernard hopkins vs Marvin Hagler....Who wins?

Hopkins. Hopkins is just a smarter fighter, he might not be as physically gifted but he's crafty enough to easily win over 12 rounds.

 

No contest. At 15 rounds hagler might get stopped.

 

:rofl:roflatsch

 

Hagler is too good, too strong, too much for a fellow ATG in Hopkins

:cheers

 

You kidding Hopkins gets his ass beat here maybe thorws himself on the floor and cries foul a couple of times to save himself from being KO ed.

 

Congratulations, this is easily the most ******ed post I have read today.

as good as hopkins is, I would always favour hagler to beat him

 

B Hop would win, he is a better boxer.... smarter, taller, more adaptable, better defense etc...he has everything over Hagler except punching power.

 

It seems that many only remember the flat-footed Hagler that destroyed Hearns, which was what Hagler morphed into after ruining his knees by doing all of his roadwork in combat boots.

Prime Hagler was the complete package with maybe the exception of exceptional handspeed. Hagler had lateral movement, accuracy, power, a jaw of iron, and a methodical patience to break his opponents down.

As good is B-hop is, I wouldn't lay money on him in this contest....well...maybe a 100/1 odds.

 

Hopkins just too wily here

Haggler has amazing boxing skills
Iron chin
And good timing

Bhop wins in a close ud decision

I can't think of many men that could have actually beaten prime Bhop

 

Plus, I've felt this way for a while

James toneys chin> hagglers

 

fcuking idiot

 

^yes you are

 

As hard as it is to believe that a chin can be better than hagglers, i'd agree with this.
Ill make a poll.