Bernard Hopkins vs Marvin Hagler.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by xRedx, Mar 10, 2013.


  1. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    348
    Jul 13, 2007
    Cyclone Hart was asked who would win between Hopkins and Hagler...He said Hopkins would.
    Hopkins skillset is generally well recognized by fellow fighters and the boxing world, if not here on ESB..haha.
    Hopkins record against southpaws is beyond formidable. But with that said, prime Marvelous Marvin was a force...if Hagler found himself being outpointed, I feel he would go for broke...in an effort to change the tide of a fight if losing. Upping the pace, and attempting to drag Hopkins into more of a fight...It would be close. But cannot pick Hopkins over Hagler. Because this just may come down to who wants it more...not just skills.
     
  2. Waynegrade

    Waynegrade Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,684
    29
    Jul 27, 2008
    As someone on here said, this would come down who may want it more. I think hagler fought with a hunger, myabe born of desperation. True Hopkins fough southpawas well, but this is Hagler, whole other monster. he could switch orthodox/southpaw seamlessly. Had good power and great conditioning. And here`s the key, he would not let Hopkins dictate and slow the pace of the fight. I think he would take Hopkins out of his comfort zone and make him fight a fight that isn`t in his best interest. Hopkins is able to school the fighters of this ear, but I don`t see him getting it over on Hagler. Hagler UD
     
  3. Lord Tywin

    Lord Tywin Guest

    Switch southpaw and orthodox seemlessly? Really? Hagler looked awful fighting orthodox.
     
  4. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    51
    Sep 8, 2007
    I thought he looked alright in his early-mid career as a righty
     
  5. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,645
    17,706
    Apr 3, 2012
    No
     
  6. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    106
    Jun 30, 2008
    Bernard Hopkins: flavor of the week. It has been one damn long week, red. :lol:

    I'll ignore the bit about Hopkins never beating a guy like Hagler because, as you should well know, Hagler never beat a guy like Hopkins, so that's a bit of a wash. These are two extremely skilled, evenly matched, brilliant, well-rounded, great fighters. Anyone who says otherwise is either biased or just flat out bad at analyzing boxing.

    Hagler could do everything, he was wonderful, but he didn't always do the right thing or the smart thing. That's bad against Hopkins.
     
  7. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,603
    46,237
    Feb 11, 2005
    Brilliantly balanced response and the only true answer.
     
  8. Waynegrade

    Waynegrade Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,684
    29
    Jul 27, 2008
    Tell that to some of the fighters he dismantled !
     
  9. Waynegrade

    Waynegrade Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,684
    29
    Jul 27, 2008
    I don`t think Hopkins could beat a prime Hagler by fighting carefully... Yet, he can`t beat Hagler by trying to make a war out of it either. It`s a great tough, close fight. But in the end, Hagler`s got a little more moxie... While I love Hopkins, is it safe to say that his rep has soared with his post middle run ? Pavlik, Paschal, and now Cloud. Longevity has definitely worked in his favor. Head to head, at 160, tough hard fought fight,but Hagler outworks him...
     
  10. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,133
    Oct 17, 2009
    Never seen it put so well. Hagler's great all-around ability made it difficult for me to pinpoint exactly what it was that made me sometimes feel he was selling himself short. He wasn't lacking in skill or versatility. He was neither over-aggressive or timid. Not an unintelligent fighter by any stretch. He was certainly consistent. But once in a while, he simply seemed to not quite want to do what would have brought him quicker success. The rounds he allowed Duran to control the tempo, the persistent orthodox stance against Leonard, etc. Small delays in calculation like that, even for a round or two, could give someone like Hopkins the opportunity to find his rhythm, find a home for his lead rights and body shots in the clinch, pivot out to restart, and steal a few decisive rounds.

    And I'm not saying that to support an argument for Hopkins. In fact, as the rounds wear on, I see Hagler being able to time the appropriate leads and catch Hopkins with the more eye-catching shots, possibly even hurting or dropping him. He'd also make it very costly for Hopkins to try and use his usual inside tactics (though would not necessarily dominate), leaving Hopkins with the burden of spending most of his time on the outside. He's very capable there, especially given the height advantage he'd employ, but reducing Bernard's options against someone comparably good at controlling the center of a ring is less than ideal, to say the least.
     
  11. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,322
    11,711
    Mar 19, 2012
    At no point in their careers was this true.
     
  12. KOTF

    KOTF Bingooo Full Member

    13,448
    26
    Jun 2, 2009
    Hagler via late decision
     
  13. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
    I favor Hopkins by mid round decision.
     
  14. rusak

    rusak Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,276
    30
    Sep 28, 2012
    Where do they get these nutbags on here? Seriously, they have internet access in the looney bins in Britain?
     
  15. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,416
    21,846
    Sep 15, 2009