Bernard Hopkins VS Roberto Duran at 160

This is such a silly ass thread...I'm gonna start a new thread called Israel Vazquez vs Floyd Mayweather...c'mon man this is psycho to even think about. Hmm..actually the size difference is even worse than Vazquez and Mayweather....Vazquez vs Paul Williams more like it....

 

Hopkins....come on.

 

Duran won like 4 rounds. Those judges were drunk.

The most exaggerated "close" fight ever.

 

What?

 

hopkins by UD

 

Hopkins outboxes him comfortably.

 

Hopkins by UD or late KO.

 

Spot on.

I had it 10-4-1 for Hagler. It was not close.

 

Hopkins by wide UD

 

Hopkins def. wins this one... I already could see him pull his last minute stunts in the last press conference...

 

Hopkins UD. Duran would be competitive. No way is Hopkins stopping Duran by KO. Duran took Hagler's punches, and Hopkins doesn't quite have Hearns' power.

Hopkins would have given Duran respect during the early rounds.

 

There some nuthuggin going on here...as usual by Hopkins fans.

1. There's only 1 fighter to knock Duran out and he's one of the hardest puncher P4P.

2. Duran was not small for Hagler at 160, so why is he too small for Hopkins at 160 now?

So it's easy for y'all to say Hopkins would win..but how many have really seen a Duran fight?

 

Hopkins circa '98 stops Duran, Hopkins was a beast in the late 90s. Much better than what he is today.

 

Hopkins by late TKO

 

B-hop UD 118 - 110