Bert Sugar on Mike Tyson, his legacy and chances against the Klitchko's

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fka_m4nyOLQ[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ewHs5oh8qjI[/ame]

 

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCyOGlY6XWU[/ame]

Looks like a Tyson blowout over both Klits to me.

 

This guy is an absolute joke, the fact that he can't tell the difference between either bro tells me he's likely suffering from dementia. How can he say Vitali is boring, how can he say Vitali fights anything like Wlad? Fighting style Vitali and Wlad are the polar opposite. Vitali has never put up a boring performance that I've seen. Against Kingpin it wasn't a great fight to watch but that was due to Johnson stinking up the joint with his 'performance'. I really don't know what this clown wants with Vitali, I mean he's taking about a man who has the highest KO ratio ever by a HW champion and has one of the highest punch outputs from a heavy as well. What the **** more does he want?

Sugar is just your typical Jewish American bigot joke pundit. Let's not forget this same clown doesn't have Lennox Lewis as one of the top 10 heavyweights, a clear top 5 heavy. This attention seeking clown is best left ignored.

 

yes, because the klitschko brothers are equal to tyrell biggs


atsch:rofllol:

 

atsch:roll:

 

Tyson had problems with fighters like Smith? He was easily winning round after round, as you can see from scorecards. True, there was a lot of holding (by Smith) and the fight was anything but exciting (again, Smith's fault), but if one calls that "problems" than Wlad had problems with almost every opponent he meets.

 

Prime Tyson would destroy Wlad. Vitali would be a tough fight, but I think his aggression would give him a close but clear decision.

 

Honestly, I think people forget what it's like to see a lightning quick heavyweight. Much less one with enough power to really hurt anyone. Never mind one with a perfected style designed specifically to counter a height and reach disadvantage.

P.S. Bert has always been biased against Tyson. Really he only even gets the spotlight on him these days when he is bashing Tyson in some way or another.

Forget 50 years younger... Sugar vs Merchant. Make it happen!

 

BONECRUSHER SMITH NEVER WON 1 RD AGAINST TYSON.........MITCH GREEN NEVER WON 1 RD AGAINST TYSON..........THATS LIKE SAYING VITALI DID POORLY AGAINST KEVIN JOHNSON:nono

 

and yes because sam peter equals prime mike tyson :-(

 

All these people want constant exchanges and risk taking in the division where one punch can end everything more than any other division. Yet most of them have never even boxed, hypocrites.

Odd how Bert Sugarstein loves Hopkins who is far more boring than the Klitschko's.

 

Tyson was on a higher level than the klitschkos. I think he would destroy
wlad in two rounds and vitali in 6. Im a fan of both klitschkos and respect
their talents.especially wlads jab the past few years. Anyway I agree and disagree
with some of the stuff bert says. He's been to a lot of great fights especially back
in the day so I give him the benefit of the doubt sometimes. Wlad and vitali never
faced anyone like tyson. Hell the last time they fought anyone hungry was arreola
no pun intended. And arreola wasn't hungry enough to be in shape granted
he got his shot to soon.

 

TysonsTKO6Vitali

 

He says Mike couldn't fight on the inside. :-(

 

Its a HUGE misconception that Mike was a inside fighter, he was a mid range fighter.
Anytime he got in close he allowed himself to be tied up over and over and over.