Bert Sugar: What's your opinion on the guy?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by klion22, Nov 16, 2007.


  1. huki

    huki huk huk ^_^;; Full Member

    6,475
    2
    Nov 12, 2006
    :lol: I don't really like Bert too much either, but you seem to really hate him. Was there something that happened between him and you? I'm sure you ran into him since you've worked for ESPN.
     
  2. Tuavale

    Tuavale Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,703
    3
    Mar 16, 2007
    He's a good character that can come up with a funny line every now and then.:smoke :smoke
     
  3. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    Bert loves to tell his stories. He also is very biased towards pre WW2 fighters. He is a one of a kind, like Zakman said, but as far as breaking down fights and analyzing what will or what happened inside the ring, I don't think too highly of him.
     
  4. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    I like him on ESPN Ringside Classic. Like the other night there was a show with Bert Sugar and Carmen Basillio talking about Robinson. That was pretty good.

    Boo
     
  5. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,737
    3,589
    Jul 10, 2005
    I was sure, the Tyson Douglas knockout got on Bert's all time knockout list. Of couse amazing, non of Tyson's PRIME knockouts got on the list. No holmes or Spinks kos there.

    I sort of agree with Marciano Walcott 1 though.
     
  6. raiderjay

    raiderjay Active Member Full Member

    742
    0
    Jan 7, 2007
    I can't stand the guy personally. He doesn't love or respect the sport that has given all of his fame. If he truly loved boxing Sugar wouldn't spend so much time slamming it, which only turns off the average sports fan that is not a big boxing fan that happens to be watching ESPN when it comes on. He generally makes any fight that he is "analyzing" seem pointless because "fighters from 50 years ago would have destroyed these two clowns". He is only concerned with making himself seem more important, knowledgable and witty than he is with actually informing the viewer with anything to interest them in the sport.

    He also is NOT like the print journalists of yesteryear because in the end those guys loved and helped promote the sport they were covering where as Sugar is PRETENDING to be old school but is really just a self promoting windbag.
     
  7. surreal deal

    surreal deal Liverpool via Krypton Full Member

    7,396
    410
    Jun 16, 2006
    see what i put above.
     
  8. surreal deal

    surreal deal Liverpool via Krypton Full Member

    7,396
    410
    Jun 16, 2006
    He also is NOT like the print journalists of yesteryear because in the end those guys loved and helped promote the sport they were covering where as Sugar is PRETENDING to be old school but is really just a self promoting windbag.[/quote]



    see my first post too.
    why is it ignored if i make a point first?:huh
    ah,screw this thread.:blah
     
  9. sthomas

    sthomas Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,002
    6
    Jul 14, 2007
    This content is protected
     
  10. raiderjay

    raiderjay Active Member Full Member

    742
    0
    Jan 7, 2007


    see my first post too.
    why is it ignored if i make a point first?:huh
    ah,screw this thread.:blah[/quote]

    Wow! Apparently if someone posts something it means it automatically has something to do with you!!!!!!!!!!!! Thats what I call an ego. I was basing my statement on him not being like a print journalist of yesteryear soley off the fact that he dresses the part with the hat and cigar and pretends to hate television journalists.
     
  11. surreal deal

    surreal deal Liverpool via Krypton Full Member

    7,396
    410
    Jun 16, 2006
    Wow! Apparently if someone posts something it means it automatically has something to do with you!!!!!!!!!!!! Thats what I call an ego. I was basing my statement on him not being like a print journalist of yesteryear soley off the fact that he dresses the part with the hat and cigar and pretends to hate television journalists.[/QUOTE]
    i know,i was having a childish tantrum.not at you in particular,just being an attention seeking dick.sorry but i wasnt that upset,just hamming it up(see 2nd smilie)
    i agree with you anyway.:good
    i dont have a huge ego by the way.if you check any of the numerous websites ive started about myself ,you'd see that was the case.:deal
     
  12. IceJohnScully

    IceJohnScully Active Member Full Member

    1,258
    2
    Sep 17, 2007
    No, no, I certainly do not hate him. But I find it extremely annoying that so many people have been bamboozled into thinking this guy is some sort of boxing expert. He knows dates, stories, the history...but expert on boxing to me is something that knows the ACT of boxing, not the history of it, the anecdotes etc. I also cant stand the way he tries to actually dismiss people when they give their opinions, I see him listen to a real expert sitting next to him give their opinion and he scrunches up his face when they say something. He is so fixated on the old time guys.... I am particularly annoyed when guys like him tout the Jack Johnson, Tunney's, etc etc like they were these unbeatable forces of nature whose skills and techniques were so brilliant... when the fact is that clubbing Foreman, etc would beat a Jack Johnson half to death. Also, for what t it is worth. I have dealt with him in person once, that was all it took, and he is exactly what I said, one of those pompous, life of the party type of guys. All the personality, in my experience, of a rock.