I mean I know the guys history, but I didn't know he has admitted to providing supplements which caused a positive nandrolone test. http://m.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/oct/24/usa.athletics?cat=world&type=article Coincidence? :think
Isn't that Marion Jones husband,or ex? *Yes it is I don't trust anything Conte or Berto says. Guy is an expert and he'd have ready made excuses for an athlete of his getting caught, like this contamination theory, claiming it wasn't his supplements, no athlete would use nandrolone for performance enhancing, etc..I'd bet Berto was using last year, he looked very strong vs Zaveck, and that's were this trace came from..
Dope someone up on nandrolone and an effective masking agent. If the tests do show a positive it'll be a minute amount and you can use the defence that no one in their right mind would use nandrolone as a PED.* Conspiracy theory
I don't know. . . I mean, I really don't think Conte would be stupid enough to supply athletes supplements with nandrolone. . . No way he'd risk going to the joint again, this time for a long time. . .
The guy really divides my own opinion. I know he's a slimey ****ed, I know he has no qualms with supplying athletes with PEDS (although they could just go elsewhere and get them) but at the same time he's one of the most outspoken and honest people when it comes to the prevalence of doping in sport, how it's done and how people avoid detection.