Bertos only ko loss was a close fight against JSK. His other two losses were to Ortiz (which was foty) and a surprisingly good fight by Guerrero. His got a substantially better chin than Khan. The only knock I can think of is hes only fought five times in the last five years. Granted I do think there were more competitive options than those two: Thurman, Bradley... even Brook, Crawford or Peterson would be better. Opinions? :bbb
Its a hell of a lot worse than Khan. Khan has actually beaten quality fighters, and quite a number of them too.
Khan has the speed to trouble. maybe even beat Floyd. his chins not the best but Floyd has knocked out a lot lately.
Berto was a doper. It's ironic USADA's poster boy is facing a known doper, who he himself is swimming thru a turbulent time full of doping suspicions. Karma has a way of working itself out maybe?
khan is better than berto.. and he fought better competition. khan would beat the sh*t out of berto. why is this even being debated?
I dont see at as a hell of a lot worse. He did beat a few quality fighters, he also had close questionable wins with Julio Diaz, Algiri, Peterson and Kotelnik.
straight up ducked him. guy's been calling him out for almost 2 years now getting absolutely no response from "TBE"