I think it will be for sure in the 10 best fight of 2009. That being said, whata shame that Collazo didnt win that fight... 9-3 twice and 7-5 for Berto ? WTF ! I had Collazo 8-4... or at worse 7-5..., wtf is going on... Why cant judge be impartial..., WHY, give me one reason WHY judge cant judge properly. Dont tell me they judge like they think the fight goes..., BS..., it's corruption, it is IMPOSSIBLE to see Berto winning that fight, and for god sake 9 to 3. Go watch the fight on dailymotion and tell me how can you possibly give Berto 9 rounds without being bias ?
I felt it was a close fight. But i didn't score it. Not much complaint on Collazo side. He said that, while the 116-111 was all wrong, the 114-113 were ok. Lederman had it 7-5 for Collazo but admitted that at least 2 rounds could have gone the other way. My humble opinion: close fight doesn't equal robbery.
post a scorecard. 8-4 Collazo is unbelievable. Berto won round 2, 7, 8, 11, 12 clear as day. No way Berto won only 4 rounds! Its impossible. I haven't seen 1 credible person who didn't give Berto those 5 rounds. He won them crystal clear. No room for debate.
