i would defo travel , its better watching it live in person and u get the whole atmosphere plus when i go on me travels i like to make a good whole day off it on the drink n that. cant beat it.
This is very much not like Sky getting the fans a quality fight that they want to see and actually showing it live and not PPV.
Yeah, because Mayweather v Marquez, Pacquaio v Cotto and Pacquaio v Clottey were on PPV as well weren't they?atsch
Don't pay it then.atsch Nobody is forcing you to. I love how everybody complains about "how much sky is" and "what a rip-off" when nobody is holding them at gun point to pay it. Get Virgin, freesat or whatever instead. Personally, I think your off your rocker if you pay £50 a month JUST to watch boxing, when alternative methods are so readily available. And I can't believe you would only watch boxing on sky, so your getting more than 2 quality fights in 10 months for £50 a month.:roll:
Oh, aren't you the funny one. Just, seriously tell me why you pay £50 a month to sky then? Like I say, if you pay it just to watch 2 hours of mostly crap domestic boxing every week you are off your rocker. But I can't believe you ONLY watch boxing on there. And if your so unhappy, just cancel.
I couldn't live without the football :rofl I would still pay it even if they had no boxing tbh but maybe they would be better served showing less of the 90% garbage Friday Fight Night and getting some more quality American based fights live.