Best Book on Stanley Ketchel?

Ummm, you can't get around the fact that HE DID FAR WORSE THAN HER, and I'm not sure how this is difficult to understand? But to apply your reasoning, what, are we suppose to hold her accountable for doing LESS than Tyson has done to others, while also cheating on her? What a hilarious statement, that is almost so comical I spat out my water all over my keyboard. A guy literally abusing and hurting elderly woman to rob them, along with his other crimes, is now somehow this poor innocent guy who gets taken advantage of by a woman. Him being a moron and a douche is a bigger crime than anything she did. A 10 year old could see what she was up to, but I'm suppose to feel bad because he's too stupid to realize it, and karma is a B? Please... Cry me a river for all the bad that Givens did to Tyson, and then look in the mirror and see if you can keep a straight face. It's literally ludicrous, and there is no logic that justifies any of this nonsense. I mean, I'm not sure if you're so far up Tyson's butt that you can't think clearly from suffocation, or what is going on here, but nothing you said is even remotely justifying anything nor proving she deserved it. Here's a new one, Tyson: The innocent naïve victim, what a factual story that would be.... Jesus

 

This isn't a who is worse contest.
Your judgement of people is harsh and dumb.
Your logic is scattered and all over the place.

Foreman robbed when he was younger too. And a few months ago he did a Lecture and Q&A at Oxford University.
Tell me how in your distorted reality where people are forever held to the bad things they did in their youth is this possible?

 

Actually I didnt give the impression that I or my opinion was superior, just that the people who actually lived it were. Thats not even a debatable point. Sorry if I have no sympathy for a woman whose professed intention was to go out and find herself a rich black man to marry and then take half of his earnings or more through any means necessary. And you want to argue or defend the argument that he got what he deserved? Well that shoe fits on the other foot too. After everything that ***** pulled Id say she got off easy, very easy. I'll stand by that opinion and no amount of false chivalry will sway my opinion.

 

My Logic is all over the place LOL... Riiigggghhhttttt.... My logic is spot on here, and has continued to be in this thread. YOU are professing that she is this horrible person for doing what she did to Tyson, but turn around, and with a straight face say, how long can we hold him accountable for the despicable actions he's committed. So how on God's Green Earth is the inverse not true about something that happened DECADES ago? Your double standards and hypocrisy is mindboggling.

 

Okay, you don't think people deserve a second chance. You think they deserve all suffering they endure in the future, no matter what change or progress they've shown. A crime from childhood is a permanent stamp of guilt, and they deserve zero sympathy for any harm that comes their way.

And I disagree. I think people do deserve a second chance. It's not fair to cut someone off from hope, or a future, if they did something wrong. We have seen countless examples of people turning their lives around. We know for a fact that growing up in conditions such as Tysons increases the likelihood of that lifestyle. He was set up to fail, and that needs to be taken into account as well.

George Foreman recently gave a lecture at Oxford University, one of the most prestigious institutions of academia on Earth. During the lecture, he talks about growing up as a criminal. So now, either all of the intellectuals have the same double standard you accuse me of having by allowing him a platform at a prestigious institution , or your judgement of others is off base, and undeservingly harsh.

Who is right and who is wrong? Oxford, or ~KuRupt~

 

Jesus, point me to a single place where I stated ANYTHING close to what you're saying. Quote me in ANY post saying people don't deserve a second chance. You LITERALLY wrong 3 paragraphs that didn't address ANYTHING I said, let alone a point I made. This is typical behavior when people don't have a leg to stand on argument wise, so they try and make points about stuff you didn't say, in the hopes it will deflect from the subject at hand. Jesus.