What about the Pacquiao brothers? no no... I t's too close for me to pick a side. How about this... Rate them or not, the Marquez brothers currently have 1 Ring Belt between them and 2 straight losses each to their respective arch rival. The Klitschko brothers currently own the HW division. Hmm.
Please make the polls public. A bunch of crackheads have voted Klitschko, yet nobody has yet justified it.
I voted Klitschko's because I do not believe in this p4p nonsense, it's just a plot to hype small fighters and based on exactly non objective criteria. Two midgets, however good they may be at beating up other midgets, against the Klitschko's is indeed no contest.
Lol...I guess I'll buy it. The Klitschkos would undoubtedly beat the Marquezes in a direct fight. Of course, if you use that criteria, then you're also saying that Andrade/Ornelas are better than the Marquezes, or that the Simms brothers are better than the Marquezes.
They're all good fighters but the Klitschkos are the first brothers to hold portions of the Heavyweight title simultaneously. That has got to count for something. Also, Vitali got his current belt after retiring for nearly 4 years & without a tuneup & against the #2 ranked HW at the time. I think 20 years from now people will remember the Klitschkos, not too sure about the Marquez brothers.
not the klitchkos fault that they havent got very good competition in the division theyre much more dominant so they get my vote